期刊文献+

匿名标准化病人在心理健康领域的应用:一项系统综述 被引量:6

Unannounced Standardized Patients in Mental Health: A Systematic Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:本研究旨在综述所有将匿名标准化病人应用于心理健康领域的研究。方法:检索了Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science、Ovid五个英文数据库和中国知网、维普、万方三个中文数据库自建库起至2020年2月15日所有已出版的英文和中文文献,并对其进行质量评价。结果:共15篇文献纳入分析,涉及9个研究项目,分别在美国、英国、波兰、中国、澳大利亚、伊朗6个国家进行,研究的病种主要集中在抑郁。所有文献都提及了匿名标准化病人的开发和信效度验证,但具体内容和方法存在差异。匿名标准化病人的应用以评价基层医生医疗服务质量为主。结论:统一的信效度验证方法亟待建立,并且应在信效度验证中增加预调查的环节。针对某项干预措施探讨能否有效提升医疗服务质量的效果评估研究是今后可参考的方向。 Objective:To conduct a systematic review of published studies that used unannounced standardized patients in real practice of mental health.Methods:We searched five English databases(Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane,Web of Science,Ovid)and three Chinese databases(CNKI,VIP,Wanfang).All papers were scored with standardized quality-assessment tools.Results:We identified 15 papers of 9 projects,which were conducted in the USA,UK,Poland,China,Australia,and Iran.Depression is the most frequently used case.All studies reported the process of developing and validating the cases,although they took different approaches.Most studies were conducted in the primary care setting to evaluate the quality of health care.Conclusion:Standardized and consistent methods for validating unannounced standardized patients should be established and validation should be conducted in the pilot of any studies.The experimental study could be considered in future studies to explore if a certain intervention could improve the quality of health care.
作者 余敏 龚雯洁 薛文庆 徐东 YU Min;GONG Wen-jie;XUE Wen-qing;XU Dong(Xiangya School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410000,China;Institute of Applied Health Research,University of Birmingham,Birmingham,B152TT,UK;Department of Psychiatry,University of Rochester,Rochester,NY14642;Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute,Guangzhou 510000,China;School of Public Health,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510000,China;School of Health Management,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期133-138,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81973059)“基于复杂干预概念框架的围生期抑郁高风险孕产妇转诊促进策略研究” 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71974211)“基于标准化病人方法的民营和公立基层卫生机构医疗质量评估与比较研究” 美国中华医学基金会(CMB)开放竞争项目(Open Competition)(20-368)“Assessing the quality of care in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine(DTCT)for common obstetric and gynecologic conditions in China using standardized patients(基于标准化病人的中国妇产科常见疾病互联网诊疗医疗质量评估)”
关键词 匿名标准化病人 心理健康 信度 效度 Unannounced standardized patients Mental health Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1杨耀防,涂明华,占永平.标准化病人技术与临床技能多站考试应用[J].医学教育探索,2003,2(1):23-25. 被引量:44
  • 2Grimes DA,Schulz KF.An overview of clinical research:the lay of the land[J].Lancet,2002,359(9300):57-61.
  • 3Egger M,Smith GD,Altman DG.Systematic reviews in health care.Meta-analysis in context[M].2nd ed.London:BMJ Publishing Group,BMA House,Tavistock Square,WC1H 9JR,2001.
  • 4Stang A.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses[J].Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-5.
  • 5Wells GA,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm.
  • 6Wells G,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.NewCastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale --Cohort Studies[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http:// www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  • 7Wells G,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.NewCastle–Ottawa Quallty Assessment Scale--Case Control Studies[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  • 8Ibbotson T,Grimshaw J,Grant A.Evaluation of a programme of workshops for promoting the teaching of critical appraisal skills[J].Med Educ,1998,32(5):486-91.
  • 9CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Cohort_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf.
  • 10CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Case-Control_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf.

共引文献1290

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部