摘要
广义气候变化诉讼实践在实体法上“助产”《巴黎协定》等气候变化国际法规则,后者也“反哺”着前者。《巴黎协定》为气候变化诉讼铺设了实证逻辑基础,其温控量化目标条款明确了气候变化诉讼客体,其国家自主贡献规则化解了政治问题的分权原则。《巴黎协定》展现出的实体法规范功能——拓展气候变化法律依据和气候变化因果关系原则的既定化,推动了2015年以后气候变化诉讼向核心主题实证嬗变。我国应依循公法、私法和交叉协同三条路径发展狭义气候变化诉讼。
The climate change litigation in broad sense"promotes the formation"of the international legal rules on climate change including the Paris Agreement,and the latter also“feeds back”the former.The Paris Agreement has paved positive logical basis for climate change litigation that its clauses on quantitative goal of temperature control clarify the object of the climate change litigation and the rules on nationally determined contribution dissolve the constraints of political issues and the principle of separation of powers.The normative functions of a substantive law shown by Paris Agreementexpanding the legal foundation for climate change and establishing the principle of causality in climate change-promote the positive evolution of climate change litigation towards the core theme after 2015.China shall develop the narrow-sensed climate change litigation along three approaches of public law,private law and the crossed-coordinated one.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第7期48-64,共17页
Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科重大研究专项“社会主义核心价值观融入生态文明法治建设的基本路径和法律样态研究”(项目编号:19VHJ016)的阶段性成果
关键词
全球气候治理
气候变化诉讼
《巴黎协定》
实证逻辑
国家自主贡献
Global Climate Governance
Climate Change Litigation
Paris Agreement
Positive Logic
Nationally Determined Contributions