中美认罪协商制度之比较

A Comparison of Guilty Plea Bargaining System betweenChina and the United States

认罪协商在我国主要体现在认罪认罚从宽制度中,在美国主要蕴含在辩诉交易中。中美认罪协商制度在价值追求、自愿性保障和被害人利益保护方面具有相似性,但在协商主体、协商内容、协商效力、证明标准、撤回认罪以及被告人上诉权等方面存在差异。我国可以从适度降低认罪认罚案件的证明标准、明确撤回认罪的法律规定和适度限制被告人的上诉权等方面,借鉴美国辩诉交易的有益经验,进一步完善我国的认罪认罚从宽制度。

Guilty bargaining in China is mainly reflected in the system of leniency upon admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment,and that in America is mainly involved in plea bargaining.The bargaining system of guilty plea between China and the United States is similar in value pursuit,voluntary protection and protection of the interests of victims,but there are differences in the aspects of subject,content,effectiveness,standard of proof,withdrawal of guilty plea and right of appeal of the defendant.China should learn from the experience of the United States from the aspects of moderately lowering the standard of proof,clarifying the legal provisions of withdrawing guilty plea and restricting the right of appeal of the defendant to further improve the system of leniency upon admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment in China.