摘要
我国《仲裁法》第58条对仲裁裁决撤销事由的规定从立法上保障了司法对仲裁的合理监督,但该条款规定的不足制约了仲裁司法审查制度的效力,最高人民法院《关于人民法院办理仲裁裁决执行案件若干问题的规定》等司法解释的出台也未能解决前述问题。有必要补充对伪造与隐瞒证据以及因仲裁员的行为导致的撤销的规定,并以公序良俗的判断标准替代社会公共利益的判断标准,以进一步完善我国仲裁司法审查制度,保障司法对仲裁监督的合理性和有效性。
Article 58 of Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulating related issues about the cancellation of an arbitration award guarantees the rational judicial supervision on arbitration.But the deficiency of the article restricts the effectiveness of judicial examination system on arbitration,even judicial interpretation like Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Handling of Cases regarding Enforcement of Arbitral Awards by the People’s Courts have not solved the issues above.It’s necessary to work on the complement of sections about forging or concealing evidence and revocation due to misconduct behavior of arbitrators,and replace the standard of social public interest with the standard of public order and good custom,so as to further perfect the judicial examination system on arbitration in China,as well as ensure its rationality and effectiveness.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2021年第1期53-60,共8页
Arbitration Study
关键词
仲裁司法审查
仲裁裁决撤销事由
仲裁程序
Judicial Examination System on Arbitration
Grounds for Cancellation of an Arbitration Award
Arbitration Process