论仲裁庭释明权的行使——基于驳回当事人撤销仲裁裁决申请之裁定的分析

On the Practice and Application of Interpretation Power of the Arbitral Tribunal——An Analysis of Ruling Based on Rejection of the Party’s Application for Cancellation of the Arbitral Award

虽然释明权问题在仲裁实践中一直存在较大争议,但是学界讨论一直较少。从我国法院的实践出发,可以归纳出在法律实践中,我国法院已经认可了仲裁庭是行使释明权的主体,也认可了仲裁庭能够行使释明权,具体包括与鉴定申请有关的释明、与证据有关的释明、对法律关系的释明及对主张的释明。法律实践中有的申请人盲目地将仲裁庭的释明或不释明视为不当行为,并以此申请撤销仲裁裁决,并未得到法院的支持。同时由于仲裁立法与仲裁规则的缺位,释明权的行使可以参考相关法律的规定。

Although the issue of interpretation power has been controversial in the practice of arbitration,there has been little academic discussion.From the practice of courts in China,it can be concluded that in the legal practice,courts have recognized that the arbitral tribunal is the main body to get the power of interpretation,and also recognized that the arbitral tribunal can exercise the power of interpretation.At the same time,due to the absence of arbitration legislation and arbitration rules,the exercise of the power of interpretation can refer to the provisions of relevant laws.In legal practice,the applicant blindly regards the interpretation of the arbitral tribunal as an improper act and applies for the cancellation of the arbitral award,which has not been supported by the court.Legal practitioners should avoid such false cognition and save judicial resources.