期刊文献+

中国城市食品安全感现状与评价分析(2019) 被引量:1

Analysis and Evaluation of Urban Food Safety in China(2019)
原文传递
导出
摘要 民以食为天,食以安为先。市场经济发展模式解决了计划经济时期的食品短缺状况,但市场竞争条件下追求食品生产利润最大化带来的食品污染、食品制假的风险在增加。2018年课题组继续对全国的城市公共安全感进行调查。餐馆食品安全感、菜市场食品安全感、未来预期食品安全感及总食品安全感的均值均低于中值。66.1%受试者在过去1年内至少发生过1起食品安全事故。食品安全事故违法信息透明度、消费者食品安全维权容易度的均值均低于中值。仅有36.2%的居民接受过食品安全教育培训。未来需要加强企业食品安全的自身建设,加强食品安全的政府规制,实现多渠道的食品安全公共监督,以有效提升城市食品安全感。 Food and safety come as the first.The development mode of market economy solves the food shortage in the period of planned economy,but the risk of food pollution and food counterfeiting caused by the pursuit of maximizing the profit of food production is increasing under market competition.In 2018,the research team continued to investigate the national sense of urban public security.The mean values of food safety in restaurants,food safety in the market,expected food safety in the future and total food safety are lower than the median.A total of 66.1%participants had experienced at least one accident of food safety in the past year.The average value of the transparency of illegal information of food safety accidents and the ease of safeguarding consumers’rights in food safety were lower than the median value.Only 36.2%of residents have received food safety education and training.In the future,it is necessary to strengthen the self-construction of enterprises in food safety,strengthen the government regulation of food safety,and realize the multi-channel public supervision of food safety so as to effectively improve the sense of food safety.
作者 陈世民 Chen Shimin
出处 《中国应急管理科学》 2020年第5期4-16,共13页 Journal of China Emergency Management Science
关键词 城市 食品安全感 食品监管与治理 urban sense of food safety food supervision and management
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1周洁红.消费者对蔬菜安全认知和购买行为的地区差别分析[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(6):113-121. 被引量:57
  • 2吉登斯.《现代性与自我认同》,赵旭东、方文译,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998年,第23-24页.
  • 3贝克.《风险社会》,汪浩译,台北:巨流图书公司,2004年.
  • 4Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987, 236:280-285.
  • 5Kasperson R E, Renn O, Slovic P, et al. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analy- s/s, 1988, 8:177 - 187.
  • 6Fishhoff, Slovic, Lichtenstein, et al. Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective. Ac- cident Analysis and Prevention, 1978, 10: 250-285.
  • 7Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears : Understanding perceived risk. In Schwing R C, Albers W A (ed). Social risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? New York: Plenum, 1980.
  • 8斯洛维奇编著.《风险的感知》,赵延东等译,北京:北京出版社,2007年.
  • 9Allen F W. Towards a holistic appreciation of risk: The challenge for communicators and policymakers. Science, Technology and Human, 1987, 12 : 138 - 143.
  • 10CORINNE W,MARK H,ALAN W. Recuperating from BSE : The shifting UK institutional basis for trust in food[J]. Appetite,2006,47(2) : 187 -195.

共引文献69

同被引文献40

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部