摘要
互联网背景下,由于网络具有超越时空、开放共享和交互等特性,市场主体违反诚信和公平竞争的行为方式和行为业态更加多元,它的竞争业态已经不再是法律明文规定的业态,司法实践中越来越多的当事人需要通过反不正当竞争法中第二条一般条款来寻求救济。但对于一般条款的具体适用,目前并无统一的可操作的实施标准。本文从大众点评网诉百度不正当竞争纠纷案出发,认定在对一般条款进行适用时,应结合个案,对"竞争关系""行为不正当性""实质性损害"三要件进行具体分析,在利益平衡的基础上,对内容信息权利人给予合理救济。
As the Internet has the characteristics of transcending the space-time limits, open sharing and interactions, the way operators in violation of fair competition become more diverse. More and more parties need to seek relief through the fallback provision on the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. However, there is no uniform operational standard about the application of the fallback provision. Start from the dispute between the Dianping.com v. Baidu, I think the Court should make specific analysis to the competition relationship, substantial damage, improper when it comes to the application of the rule, and at the same time, give the right holder sufficient judicial remedy on the basis of the balance of interests.
出处
《现代法治研究》
2019年第3期44-50,共7页
Journal of Modern Rule of Law
关键词
一般条款
竞争关系
实质性损害
不正当性
Fallback Provision
Competition Relationship
Substantial Damage
Improper