期刊文献+

高强度聚焦超声治疗瘢痕妊娠对卵巢储备功能的影响 被引量:5

Effect of high intensity focused ultrasound on ovarian reserve function during the treatment of scar pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较高强度聚焦超声(high intensity focused ultrasound,HIFU)和子宫动脉栓塞术(uterine artery embolization,UAE)治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy,CSP)时对卵巢储备功能的影响。方法采用回顾性研究的方法,选择2013-01至2018-06保定市妇幼保健院收治的CSPⅡ型患者142例,根据治疗前预处理方法不同分为两组,HIFU组96例采用HIFU,UAE组46例采用UAE,预处理后行宫腹腔镜手术,比较两组术前,术后3、6、12个月的血清雌二醇(E2)、卵泡刺激素(FSH)、促黄体生成素(LH)、抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平及窦卵泡数(AFC)的变化。比较两组术后患者血HCG在4周内转阴率及5周内月经恢复率。结果(1)HIFU组不同时间点AMH、FSH、LH、E2和AFC比较,差异均无统计学意义。(2)UAE组不同时间点E2差异无统计学意义;而AMH、AFC在UAE后3、6、12个月较术前显著降低;FSH及LH在术后3、6个月较前明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)两组相比,术前AMH、FSH、LH、E2、AFC差异均无统计学意义;UAE组AMH、AFC术后3个月、6个月均低于HIFU组相应时间点,而FSH、LH水平则高于HIFU组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(4)HIFU组和UAE组术后5周月经恢复率分别为98.9%和91.3%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后4周血β-HCG转阴率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论HIFU治疗CSP安全有效、无创、可重复,不影响卵巢储备功能,尤其对于有再生育要求的CSP患者更具有重要意义。 Objective To explore the effect of high intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU)and uterine artery embolization(UAE)on ovarian reserve function during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods One hundred and forty-two patients with CSPⅡtreated between January 2013 and June 2018 were selected.According to pretreatment methods,these patients were divided into two groups:the HIFU group(n=96)in which HIFU was used and the UAE group(n=46)where UAE was used.After pretreatment,hysteroscopy and laparoscopy were performed.The levels of serum estradiol(E2),follicle stimulating hormone(FSH),luteinizing hormone(LH),anti-mullerian hormone(AMH)and the change of antral follicle count(AFC)were observed before operation and 3,6 and 12 months after operation.These patients were followed up in order to record the side effects.Results(1)There was no statistically significant difference in AMH,FSH,LH,E2 or AFC between patients in the HIFU group at different time points.(2)In the UAE group,there was no significant difference in E2 between these patients before or after operation.However,AMH and AFC were significantly lower after 3,6,12 months.FSH and LH were significantly higher after 3 months and 6 months,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)There was no significant difference in AMH,FSH,LH,E2 or AFC between the two groups before operation.AMH and AFC in the UAE group were significantly decreased 3 and 6 months after operation compared with the HIFU group at the corresponding time points.However,FSH and LH levels increased,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(4)Menstrual recovery rates in the HIFU group and UAE group were 98.9%and 91.3%respectively 5 weeks after operation.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the recovery rate of bloodβ-HCG between the two groups 4 weeks after operation.Conclusions HIFU is safe,effective,non-invasive and repeatable during the treatment of CSP,which does not affect ovarian reserve function.HIFU is of special significance for CSP patients who hope for reproduction.
作者 王雅慧 李全香 杨娜 付琳琳 WANG Yahui;LI Quanxiang;YANG Na;FU Linlin(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Baoding Maternal and Children Health Care Hospital,Baoding 071000,China)
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2020年第5期378-381,共4页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
基金 2019年保定市科学技术研究与发展指导计划(1941ZF068)
关键词 妊娠 剖宫产术 高强度聚焦超声 子宫动脉介入栓塞 卵巢储备功能 pregnancy cesarean section high intensity focused ultrasound uterine artery embolization ovarian reserve function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献98

  • 1李成志,王智彪,陈文直,卞度宏,曹友德,赵建武,文爽,田耘博,李香进.聚焦超声治疗外阴白色病变的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(6):373-377. 被引量:95
  • 2刘萍,陈春林,高绿芬,曾北蓝,马奔.子宫腺肌病UAE治疗后妊娠及分娩的研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):22-25. 被引量:17
  • 3金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 4邓波,章晓梅,任平,官洁,马艳萍,武泽.五种预测卵巢储备指标的临床研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(4):102-104. 被引量:37
  • 5向阳.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫肌瘤的相关问题[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,24(1):28-30. 被引量:16
  • 6Taran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC, et al. Characteristics indicating adenomyosis coexisting with leiomy omas :a case-control study [J]. Hum Reprod,2010,25 (5) : 1177-1182.
  • 7Boeer B, Wallwiener M, Rom J, et al. Differences in the clinical phenotype of adenomyosis and leiomyomas : a retrospective,questionnaire-based study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet ,2014,289 (6) : 1235-1239.
  • 8Froeling V, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Hamm B, et al. Uterine artery emboli- zation to treat uterine adenomyosis with or without uterine leiomyomata: results of symptom control and health-related quality of life 40 months after treatment[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012,35 (3) : 523-529.
  • 9Chen J, Chen W, Zhang L, et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis:a review of 9988 cases[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2015 ( 27 ) : 671-676.
  • 10Lee JS, Hong GY, Park BJ,et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroid & adenomyosis:a single center experience from the Republic of Korea[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2015 (27) : 682 -687.

共引文献910

同被引文献57

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部