期刊文献+

P2P网贷型非法集资的入罪标准实证研究 被引量:3

An Empirical Study on the Incrimination Standard of Illegal Fund-raising by P2P Network Loan
原文传递
导出
摘要 P2P非法集资案件中入罪标准的关键在于非法性、回报承诺及"违反国家金融法律法规"要件、出罪条款和立案标准问题。通过实证分析,发现非法性要件的问题在于"吸收"含义的缺位,相对而言资金池的概念更容易厘定,可以借助资金池的概念去厘清"吸收"的概念。回报承诺要件的问题关键在于"承诺"内涵的不明。"违反国家金融法律法规"要件的问题在于大部分P2P网贷型案件的案发时间都缺乏符合社会现实的金融法规基础。出罪条款问题的关键在于司法过程中因为条款的模糊性而不能得到很好地适用,进而需要对条款进行刑法解释。立案标准的问题关键在于"数额+人数"的门槛过于机械,忽略了案件可能造成的实际影响,且规范制定较早,相应门槛已经过低。上述问题均需要通过相应的立法对策或司法解释去解决。 The key problem in the standard of incrimination of P2P illegal fund-raising is its unlawfulness,lure and"violation of financial law"element,decriminalization clause and filing standard.By positive analysis,the problem of the unlawfulness is lacking in definition of"absorb".While the key problem of the lure is lacking in definition of"acceptance"."Violation of financial law"element’s defect is the law is too old that cannot be applied on the P2P cases.The decriminalization clause’s problem is its ambiguity of words.So we need to make a criminal law explanation on this clause.The problem to the filing standard is the"amount&number of people"is too mechanical that it may neglect the influence of the case.What’s more,the regulation are too old and the numbers are too low.The questions above needed too be solved by legislation and judicial interpretation.
作者 姜涛 张志鼎 Jiang Tao;Zhang Zhiding
出处 《刑法论丛》 CSSCI 2018年第4期333-379,共47页 Criminal Law Review
关键词 P2P网贷 非法集资 入罪标准 刑法的谦抑性 资金池 P2P Network Loan Illegal fund-raising Incrimination standard Tolerant rule of criminal law Cash pool
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献210

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部