摘要
在我国行政诉讼中,被诉行政行为与当事人之间是否具有利害关系是界定原告资格的关键标准。为了给利害关系认定提供客观清晰的判断框架和思考步骤,我国行政审判尝试引入德国法上的保护规范理论。但是,法律解释技术的不成熟导致保护规范理论在适用中遭遇法规范目的解释不确定与“空转”困境,并在客观效果上导致当事人的诉权受到限缩。可以采用类型化适用与公因式提取的技术缓和法规范目的解释不确定性与“空转”困境。当事人的“限诉”困境则可以通过私益保护性标准的松动与注意要求规则的适用予以化解。
The theory of Protection Norms originating from German law is transplanted into the administrative trails of China in order to provide an objective and clear judging framework and thinking steps for identification of interest.However,immature law interpretation technique will make theory of protection norms encounter difficulties to explain the purpose of law and keep racing.The application of theory of protection norms will also limit parties’prosecution right objectively.The dilemma to explain the purpose of law could be relieved by“typing of application”and“solving of common factor”.The other dilemma of limitation on parties’right could be relieved by loosing of the criterion of the protection of private interests and the application of“Rücksichtnahmegebot”.
出处
《法商研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期57-70,共14页
Studies in Law and Business
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CFX053)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC820076)
关键词
行政诉讼
原告资格
保护规范理论
主观公权利
利害关系
administrative litigation
plaintiff qualification
theory of protection norms
subjective public rights
interest criterion