中国法理学研究的范式反思

Reflections on the Paradigm of Chinese Jurisprudence Research

目前,中国法理学的发展受到了学科内外的诸多质疑,通过梳理中国法理学研究的范式变迁可以了解其发展的问题所在.中国法理学研究范式的变迁以社会为基础,经过数十年的发展已经形成了数个研究样态.在这些研究样态之下,政法法学、法教义学、社科法学3种最主要的研究范式此消彼长.从法理学学科内外的视角来看,中国法理学研究范式变迁存在西方法学研究范式支配、中国法治实践问题限制、中国的法理学命题3种主要的约束因素.如果能加强法理学范式研究,中国法理学则有可能形成若干自主的范式.

At present,the development of Chinese jurisprudence has faced many doubts both within and outside the discipline.By combing the paradigm shift of Chinese jurisprudence research,we can understand the problems in its development.The paradigms shift of jurisprudence in China is based on society.After decades of development,Chinese jurisprudence has formed several research paradigms.During this process,Political and Legal Jurisprudence,Legal Dogmatic along with Law and Social Sciences are main research paradigms of jurisprudence research which have been changed and evolved.From the perspectives of both internal and external jurisprudence,the dominance of Western legal research paradigm,the constraints of China's legal practice issues,and the Constraints on the subjective proposition of Chinese Jurisprudence are the main reasons limiting the development of China's jurisprudence research paradigms.If the study of legal paradigms can be strengthened,Chinese jurisprudence may develop a number of independent paradigms.