期刊文献+

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplantation:State of the Art 被引量:10

原文传递
导出
摘要 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor that often occurs in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.The incidence of HCC is growing worldwide.With respect to any other available treatment for liver cancer,liver transplantation (LT) has the highest potential to cure.LTallows for removal at once of both the tumor ("seed")and the damaged-hepatic tissue ("soil") where cancerogenesis and chronic liver disorders have progressed together.The Milan criteria (MC) have been applied worldwide to select patients with HCC for LT,yielding a 4-year survival rate of 75%.These criteria represent the benchmark for patient selection and are the basis for comparison with any other suggested criteria.However,MC are often considered to be too restrictive,and recent data show that between 25% and 50% of patients with HCC are currently transplanted beyond conventional indications.Consequently,any unrestricted expansion of selection criteria will increase the need for donor organs,lengthen waiting periods,increase drop-out rates,and impair outcomes on intention-to-treat analysis.Management of HCC recurrence after LT is challenging.There are a few reports available regarding the safety and efficacy of sorafenib for HCC recurrence after LT,but the data are heterogeneous.A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial comparing placebo with sorafenib is advised.Alternatively,a metaanalysis of patient survival with sorafenib for HCC recurrence after LT could be helpful to characterize the therapeutic benefit and safety of sorafenib.Here,we review the use of LT for HCC,with particular emphasis on the selection criteria for transplantation in patients with HCC and management of HCC recurrence after LT.
出处 《Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology》 SCIE 2014年第3期176-181,共6页 临床与转化肝病杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1Claas FH, van Rood JJ. The hyperimmunized patient: from sensitization toward transplantation. Transpl Int 1988; 1: 53-57.
  • 2Zhou YC, Cecka JM. Sensitization in renal transplantation. Clin Transpl 1991: 313-323.
  • 3Cook D J, Terasaki PI, Iwaki Y, Terashita G, Takeda A, Fujikawa J, et al. The flow cytometry crossmatch in kidneytransplantation. Clin Transpl 1987: 409-414.
  • 4Ogura K, Terasaki PI, Johnson C, Mendez R, Rosenthal JT, Ettenger R, et al. The significance of a positive flow cytometry crossmatch test in primary kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 56: 294-298.
  • 5Patel R, Terasaki PI. Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 1969; 280: 735-739.
  • 6Cecka JM. Calculated PRA (CPRA): the new measure of sensitization for transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 26-29.
  • 7Hawksworth JS, Leeser D, Jindal RM, Falta E, Tadaki D, Elster EA. New directions for induction immunosuppression strategy in solid organ transplantation. Am J Surg 2009; 197: 515-524.
  • 8Kirk AD. Induction immunosuppression. Transplantation 2006; 82: 593-602.
  • 9Cherikh WS, Kauffman HM, McBride MA, Maghirang J, Swinnen L J, Hanto DW. Association of the type of induction immunosuppression with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft survival, and patient survival after primary kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 76: 1289-1293.
  • 10Kirk AD, Cherikh WS, Ring M, Burke G, Kaufman D, Knechfle SJ, et al. Dissociation of depletional induction and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in kidney recipients treated with alemtuzumab. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 2619-2625.

共引文献12

同被引文献44

引证文献10

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部