期刊文献+

Measuring systemic importance of banks considering risk interactions: An ANOVA-like decomposition method 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 The systemic importance of a bank is usually measured by its effect on the banking system,conditional on the insolvency of the bank and solvency of other banks.However,banks encounter different kinds of shocks simultaneously in reality.So that,the conditional re-sults give biased estimates of banks'systemic importance when potential risks are ignored.Researchers like Tarashev et al.proposed the Shapley value method to deal with risk in-teractions,but it suffers heavy computational costs.This paper proposes an ANOVA-like decomposition method to measure the systemic importance of banks in more compli-cated and realistic environments,which considers both interactions and individual effects of multiple shocks and provides a more exact estimation of systemic importance.It is found that the method proposed in this paper fits well in the network models.And meanwhile,a discussion between the method proposed in this paper and the Shapley value method is made based on the numerical example,which aims to demonstrate it's the advantages.The Shapley value method requires 2n subsystems,while the ANOVA-like decomposition method requires only n+1 model runs.In the application part,the pro-posed method is adopted to measure the systemic importance of 16 Chinese listed banks.With low computational costs,the model outputs the individual effect,interaction,and total effect of each bank.The results confirm that interactions of different shocks play a significant role in the systemic importance of a bank;thus,the total effect considering interactions should be adopted.
出处 《Journal of Management Science and Engineering》 2020年第1期23-42,共20页 管理科学学报(英文版)
基金 This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 71425002,71571179
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Allen F, Gale D. Financial contagion [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108 ( 1 ) : 1 - 33.
  • 2Freixas X, Parigl B, Rochet J C. Systemic risk, interbank relations and liquidity provision by the central bank[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2000, 32(3 Pt 2) : 611 -638.
  • 3Thumer S, Hanel R, Pichler S. Risk trading, network topology and banking regulation [J]. Quantitative Finance, 2003, 3 (4) : 306 -319.
  • 4Elsinger H, Lehar A, Summer M. Risk assessment for banking systems[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(9): 1301 - 1314.
  • 5Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393:440 -442.
  • 6Martinez-Jaramillo S, Perez O P, Embriz F A, et al. Systemic risk, financial contagion and financial fragility [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2010, 34( 11 ) : 2358 -2374.
  • 7Soramtki K, Bech M, Arnold J, et al. The topology of interbank payment flows[J]. Physica A, 2007, 379 (1) : 317 -333.
  • 8Becher C, Millard S, Soramaki K. The Network Topology of CHAPS Sterling[R]. UK: Bank of England, 2008, No. 355.
  • 9Anand K, Gai P, Kapadia S, et al. A network model of financial system resilience [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2013, 85:219 -235.
  • 10Barabasi A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439) : 509 -512.

共引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部