期刊文献+

剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠四种治疗方法有效性及优缺点对比研究

Comparative Study on the Effectiveness,Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Treatment Methods for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价和对比分析剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的(CSP)4种治疗方法 有效性及优缺点.方法回顾性分析我院2014年1月~2015年12月共收治的80例CSP患者的病例资料.该80例患者按照不同的治疗方法分成四组.药物组20例采用药物保守治疗,清宫组20例采用直接清宫治疗,栓塞组采用双侧子宫动脉栓塞后清宫手术治疗,手术组采用剖腹或是经阴式手术行病灶清除术,比较四组患者治疗过程中出血量、 住院天数等相关指标.结果 通过临床治疗分析,其中四组患者的出血量分别为(216.2±16.5)、(86.2±8.9)、(58.3±11.6)、(867.21±27.5)ml;四组住院天数中值为9、4、7、10 d,各组以上数据组间比较差异有显着性(P<0.05).结论 通过本研究表明,药物治疗出血多,累计住院时间及住院费用较高,不主张作为治疗首选;子宫动脉栓塞治疗可以明显降低出血风险,鼓励积极选择;手术治疗对于凶险性及孕周较大患者联合子宫动脉栓塞治疗可以增加保留子宫的几率. Objective To evaluate and compare the effectiveness and advantages and disadvantages of four treatments of pregnancy induced by cesarean section(CSP).Methods A retrospective analysis of 80 cases of CSP patients treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 were included.80 patients were divided into four groups according to different treatment methods.20 patients in the drug group were treated conservatively.In curettage group,20 cases were treated with direct curettage,and the embolization group was treated with curettage after bilateral uterine artery embolization,the operation group with laparotomy or transvaginal surgical debridement,the amount of bleeding were compared between the four groups in the course of treatment,hospitalization and other related indicators.Results Through the analysis of the clinical treatment,the amount of bleeding of the four groups of patients respectively(216.2±16.5),(86.2±8.9),(58.3±11.6),(867.21±27.5)ml;four groups of hospital days the value of 9,4,7,10 d,the data in each group above differences were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The results of this study show that drug treatment of bleeding,total hospitalization time and cost is high,do not advocate for the treatment of choice;uterine artery embolization therapy can significantly reduce the risk of bleeding,encourage positive selection;surgical treatment for dangerous and gestational age patients combined uterine artery embolization in the treatment can increase the chance to retain the uterus.
作者 段秀芳 DUAN Xiu-fang(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Hanchuan Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital,Hanchuan 431600,Hubei,China)
出处 《医学信息》 2017年第26期66-67,共2页 Journal of Medical Information
关键词 剖宫产 瘢痕部位妊娠 有效性 Cesarean section Scar pregnancy Effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:258-264.
  • 2Corey E. Tabit,William B. Chung,Naomi M. Hamburg,Joseph A. Vita.Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications[J]. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders . 2010 (1)
  • 3Peter John Wormald.The agger nasi cell: the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess[J]. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery . 2003 (5)
  • 4华少萍,凌奕,莫秀兰,等.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠32例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,30(18):5688-5689.
  • 5Maymon R, Svirsky R, Smorgiek N, et al. Fertility performance tnd obstetric outcomes among women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. J Ultrasound Med,2011,30(9) :1179.
  • 6Sedeghi H, Rutherford T, Raekow BW, et al. Cesarean scar eetop- c pregnancy: case series and review of the literature[J].Am J Perinatol,2010,27(2) :111.
  • 7Godin PA,Bassil S,Donnez J. An eetopic pregnancy developing in previous caesarian section scaf[J]. Fertil Stefil, 1997,67 (2) : 398.
  • 8Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean sear eetopic preg- lancies : etiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2006:107(6):1373.
  • 9Robinson J,Dayal M, Gindof{ P, et al. A novel surgical treatment for caesarean scar pregnaney~ laparoseopieally assisted operative hysteroscopy[J].Fertil Steril,2009,92(4) :1497. el3.
  • 10Lin N, Li X, Song T, et al. The effect of collagen -binding vascular endothelial growth factor on the remodeling of scarred rat uterus following full-thickness injury [ J ]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33 ( 6 ) : 1801.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部