116项继续医学教育项目评估结果及影响指标分析

Evaluation outcomes and influential indexes analysis of 116 continuing medical education programs

目的分析116项继续医学教育项目评估结果并探讨影响评估结果的指标,为明确项目质量评估重点提供参考。方法采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验对28个指标的评估结果进行单因素分析,采用logistic回归进行多因素分析。结果logistic回归显示:项目基本信息一致性[OR=6.712,95%CI(1.314~34.275)]、主办单位是否提供教材[OR=109.386,95%CI(2.577~4642.659)]、现场学员与签到人数是否符合[OR=13.296,95%CI(2.440~72.456)]、学员考核材料反馈[OR=19.069,95%CI(3.713~97.929)]、教师评估材料反馈[OR=13.497,95%CI(2.672~68.181)]和主办单位是否按要求送审学分[OR=51.326,95%CI(4.999~526.996)]为继续医学教育项目评估结果合格与否的影响指标。结论继续医学教育管理部门应健全项目评估制度,根据研究结果改进并完善评估指标,重视影响评估结果的指标,发挥评估指标的导向作用。

Objective To analyze evaluation outcomes and influential indexes of 116 continuing medical education(CME)programs,and to offer references for ascertaining the quality evaluation focuses of CME programs.Methods Chi-Square test and Fisher exact test were adopted to perform univariate analysis on evaluation outcomes of 28 indexes,and logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.Results Logistic regression showed that the indexes influencing the evaluation outcomes of programs qualified or not included consistency of basic information[OR=6.712,95%CI(1.314,34.275)],whether textbooks provided by host institutions[OR=109.386,95%CI(2.577,4642.659)],whether the number of people in the meeting room equaled with the signature list[OR=13.296,95%CI(2.440,72.456)],feedback of learners examination materials[OR=19.069,95%CI(3.713,97.929)],feedback of teachers evaluation materials[OR=13.497,95%CI(2.672,68.181)]and whether submit learners'credits according to regulations or not[OR=51.326,95%CI(4.999,526.996)].Conclusion The administrative departments of CME should complete program evaluation regulations,adjust and perfect evaluation indexes based on research outcomes,emphasize on influential indexes of evaluation outcomes,and give full play of the guiding role of evaluation indexes.