期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征急诊介入治疗与药物治疗结果分析

The prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and drug treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析急性冠脉综合征患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及药物治疗的结果。方法2004年1月至2006年1月62例急性冠脉综合征患者施行急诊PCI术,与同期药物治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者68例比较,并随访12个月,比较两组住院死亡率,平均住院时间,远期死亡率,射血分数,再发心梗率。结果PCI组住院死亡率1.6%,平均住院时间(9.8±4.3)d,远期死亡率3.2%,再缺血、再梗死和再闭塞发生率4.8%。结论急诊冠脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征安全有效,有助于改善预后。 Objective To analyze the short-term and long-term prognosis of 62 patients with acute cor- onary sydrome(ACS) underwent emergency pereutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) and 68 patients with ACS underwent drug treatment.Methods Continuous patients with ACS from Jan 2004 to Jan 2006 were enrolled.To analyze the clinical features and the follow-up results of these patients,and the average follow-up time was 12 months.Results Of 62 patients with coronary syndrome(ACS) underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)in-hospital mortality was 1.6%,and average length of hospital stay was 9.8±4.3 days and the long-term mortality was 3.2%.The rate of major adverse cardiac event was 4.8%.Conclusion Emergency PCI can decrease the clinical events after myocardial infarction,shorten the length of hospital stay,and improve the short-term and long-term prognosis result.Emergency PCI is a sale and efficiency therapeutic measure to ACS,it can conduce to improve prognosis.
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2007年第12期19-21,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 急诊介入 预后 Acute coronary syndrome Pereutaneous coronary intervention Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1颜红兵,朱小玲,高海,李南,李世英,艾辉,王健,柯元南.直接冠状动脉介入治疗时无复流高危患者是否应用Guardwire Plus装置的对比研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(3):138-141. 被引量:11
  • 2The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions[J]. Eur Heart J,2005,26: 804-847.
  • 3Tamis-Holland JE, Palazzo A, Stebbins AL, et al. GUSTO Ⅱ-B Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. Benefits of direct angioplasty for women and men with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes Angioplasty (GUSTO Ⅱ-B) Angioplasty Substudy [J]. Am Heart J,2004,147:133-139.
  • 4The FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomized multicentre study[J]. Lancet, 1999,354:708-715.
  • 5Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina[J]. Lancet, 2002,360: 743-751.
  • 6Nakamura T, Kubo N, Seki Y, et al. Effects of a distal protection device during primary stenting in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction[J]. Circ J,2004,68:763-768.
  • 7Wemer GS, Lang K, Kuehnert H, et al. Intracomnary veraparnil for reversal of no-reflow during coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,57:444-451.
  • 8Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery[J]. N Engl J Med,2003,349:1315-1323.
  • 9不稳定性心绞痛诊断和治疗建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,2000,28(6):409-412. 被引量:2696
  • 10高润霖.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725. 被引量:5003

共引文献7475

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部