摘要
1919年夏,以李大钊为代表的早期马克思主义者和资产阶级改良主义者胡适之间关于问题与主义的一场论战,它的起因是如何改造中国的问题,不是由于马克思主义广泛传播,资产阶级右翼恐惧而挑起。它是新文化运动统一战线内部的意见分歧,不是敌对性质的矛盾,应该正确估量近代中国的改良主义。它的影响、意义等要实事求是分析,不准夸大,认为这次论战是早期马克思主义者的胜利和改良主义的失败是没有根据的。
In the summer of 1919, there was a debate between Li Ta-chao, the representative of the early Marxists and Hu shih, the representative of the reformers. The debate was not due to the wide spread of Marxism and the fear of the bourgeoisie but due to how to remould China. It was not the contradiction between the enemy and ourselves but the divergence of the view within the united front. We should objectively estimate the modern chinese reformism and analyse its influence, significance and so on. It is groundless to regard the debate as the early victiory of the Marxists and the defeat of fhe reformers.
出处
《杭州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
1987年第2期66-74,共9页
JOURNAL OF HANGZHOU UNIVERSITY(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)