期刊文献+

工程地质岩组与岩体质量分级在岩石工程中应用对比 被引量:27

APPLICATION COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL ROCK GROUP AND ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATION IN ROCK ENGINEERING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在多不良地质体存在条件下,不同建设阶段岩体质量级别判别结果常会出现较大差别,成为岩石工程建设中争论焦点之一。岩体质量分级可给出相应力学参数,但对复杂地质体的变形破坏模式难以区分,影响到合理的开挖和支护方案的制定。结合岩石工程目标,在地层岩性对比和相应物理力学特性区分基础上,划分出的工程地质岩组,成为了工程地质条件评价、分区和工程规划的重要基础。在岩石地下工程设计和施工中还需有岩体质量分级作为依据。前者是以岩体工程地质力学观点为基础的较大范围的定性分类,抓住地质体关键内因之一的岩体地质建造和构造改造来分类,有利于得出相应变形破坏模式;后者以单指标或多指标来计算评判岩体质量好坏,包括了工程岩体本身和所处地质环境因素。在岩石工程不同阶段和不同层次上,它们的依据和应用各有所长,对工程地质问题的大尺度超前预报和工程设计起着不同作用,而又有一定的交叉和重叠,结合起来运用可发挥合理解释变形破坏模式和对比不同阶段判别结果的工程效果。结合雁门关隧道工程,给出它们的应用情况对比,以便于其在不同工程建设中更好地区别运用。 Due to existence of various unfavorable geological bodies,assessment results of rock mass quality are often varied at different stages of construction,and induce some arguments. In order to assist in rock engineering aims,the engineering geological rock grouping is necessary to carry out on analyses of lithology and physi-mechanical features,for differentiation of main components of engineering geological zonation and evaluation. The widely applied rock mass quality classification is useful in rock engineering design and construction for surrounding rock stability purpose. The former comes from the viewpoint of rock mass structural control and takes account of rock mass types from a large range,while the latter adopting single or multiple parameters for assessment rock mass quality,including rock mass itself and surrounding environment. At different stages and layers,the two methods play distinctive roles,as for large scale geological forecast and engineering design, respectively,but with somewhat joints and overlays. The obvious differences of rock mass quality indices obtained at various stages of construction,can be clarified and interpreted from views of engineering geological rock group,with respect to unfavorable geological bodies. Taking the Yanmenguan Tunnel as one case example,their roles and application process are presented and discussed. The different advantages of the two systems and obtained results could be used in other rock engineering projects.
出处 《岩石力学与工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第S2期3205-3214,共10页 Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2010CB732001) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40972198)
关键词 工程地质 工程地质分区 工程地质岩组 岩体质量分级 engineering geology engineering geological zonation engineering geological rock group rock mass quality classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1侯康明,袁道阳,孟万辉.走滑断裂粘滑、蠕滑作用形成的地质地貌特征[J].地震地质,1995,17(3):253-258. 被引量:6
  • 2尚彦军,史永跃,曾庆利,尹俊涛,薛继洪.昆明上公山隧道复杂地质条件下TBM卡机及护盾变形问题分析和对策[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(21):3858-3863. 被引量:83
  • 3刘志春,李文江,孙明磊,朱永全.乌鞘岭隧道F4断层区段监控量测综合分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(7):1502-1511. 被引量:76
  • 4陈宗基.地下巷道长期稳定性的力学问题[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1982,1(1):1-19.
  • 5王思敬.从工程地质观点探讨岩体力学属性.地质科学,1966,1(1):64-78.
  • 6谷德振,王思敬.论岩体工程地质力学的基本问题[C]//全国首届工程地质学术会议论文集.北京:科学出版社,1983:182-189.
  • 7GU D Z, WANG S J. Fundamentals of geomechanics for rock ettgineedng in Chitta[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1982, (Supp.12): 75-87.
  • 8TAN T K. The NATM studied from viewpoint of rheology and geodynamics[C]//Proc, the 6th Congr. ISRM. Montreal: [s.n.], 1987 1 265 - 1 270.
  • 9TAN T K. Rock bursts, case records, theory and control[C]//Proc. Int Sym. on Engineering in Complex Rock Formation. Beijing: [s.n.], 1986: 32-47.
  • 10张成恭 王思敬 张倬元 等.中国工程地质学[M].北京:科学出版社,2000..

共引文献127

同被引文献171

引证文献27

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部