期刊文献+

语用原则、语用推理和语义演变 被引量:308

Pragmatic principles, pragmatic inference, semantic change,
原文传递
导出
摘要 当今历史语义学的主流是探讨语义演变的动因和机制,这种探讨的一个重要方面是借鉴和采纳语用学的研究成果,初步的结论是,交谈双方遵循一定的语用原则(特别是“适量准则”)是语义演变的重要动因,语用推理和推导义的“固化”是语义演变的主要机制。本文是对近年来这方面研究情况的介绍。 The mainstream of present historical semantics is the study of the motivation and mechanism of semantic change, and this study is largely based on the achievements of pragmatics. Many historical semanticists hold that semantic change is motivated by Gricean pragmatic principles, the Principle of Quantity in particular, which speakers and hearers adhere to in on-line conversation, and that the mechanism of semantic change involves pragmatic inference and the grammaticaJization of inferred meanings.
作者 沈家煊
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期243-251,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1沈家煊.实词虚化的机制──《演化而来的语法》评介[J].当代语言学,1998(3):41-46. 被引量:502
  • 2沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2321
  • 3沈家煊.说“不过”,提交“纪念吕叔湘先生诞辰100周年学术研讨会”(北京)论文[Z].,2004..
  • 4沈家煊.“语法化”研究综观[J].外语教学与研究,1994,26(4):17-24. 被引量:1161
  • 5Brown, P & S C. Levinson. 1987[1978]. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Bybee, J ,R Perkins & W Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the Worm [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Geis, M L & A M Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561-566.
  • 8Grice, 1975. Logic and conversation [A]. In P Cole,& J Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press.
  • 9Hopper, P J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization [A]. In E C Traugott & B Heine(eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 10Horn, L R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature[A]. In D Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context : Linguistic Applications [ C ]. Washington, D C : Georgetown University Press.

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:177
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献3671

同被引文献2525

引证文献308

二级引证文献1408

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部