期刊文献+

论性别话语风格的相对性——一种情景研究模式 被引量:18

On Relativity of Male and Female Conversational Styles:A Situational Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前语言与性别差异研究存在着两元论和多元论之争。通过对四个话语策略——话语量、附加问句、闪避词使用和谈话打断的分析 ,我们可以发现性别话语风格是相对的 ,除受交际者的性别制约外 ,还受交际场合、话题、交际者之间的角色关系以及社会文化规约等多种因素的影响 ,因而呈现出相对性、互动性、多元性的特点。只有从情景研究模式入手 ,我们才能更加准确定位并解释言语交际中的性别差异。这也体现了语言与性别研究正从静态走向动态。 There exist disputes over binary thinking and pluralistic thinking on the study of language and gender today. By analyzing four linguistic strategies,namely, the amount of talk, tag questions, hedges and interruptions, we can find that the style differences in male and female conversation are also constrained by such factors as setting, topic, role relationships and socio-cultural conventions apart from gender. Therefore, male and female conversational styles are relative, interactive and pluralistic. Only from a situational perspective can we better locate and interpret gender differences in speech communication. This also reflects a gradual shift from static-and-macro research to dynamic-and-micro research in language and gender study.
出处 《外语教学》 北大核心 2004年第5期27-30,共4页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 语言与性别 话语风格 相对性 情景研究模式 language and gender conversational style relativity situational perspective
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Bergvall, V. et al. (eds). Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theories and Practice[C]. London and New York: Longman,1996.
  • 2Cameron, D. et. al. Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions[A]. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D.(eds). Women in Their Speech Communities[C]. London: Longman, 1989:89.
  • 3Coates, J. Women, Men and Language (second edition)[M].London: Longman, 1993.
  • 4Fishman, P. Conversational insecurity[A]. In Giles, H. ,Robinson, P. ,Smith, M. (eds). Language: Social Psychological Perspectives[C]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1980.
  • 5Holmes, J. Hedging, fencing and other conversational gambits:An analysis of gender differences in New Zealand Speech[A]. In Pauwels, A. (ed.). Women and Language in Australian and New Zealand Society[C]. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications. 1987.
  • 6--. Women, Men and Politeness[M]. New York: Longman,1995.
  • 7--. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research[J]. Language and Society, 1999(2).
  • 8--. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (second edition)[M].London: Pearson Education Limited,2001.
  • 9James, D. and Clarke, S. Women, men and interruptions:A critical review[A]. In Tannen, D. (ed.). Gender andConversational Interaction[C]. New York and Oxford; Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 10Kipers, P. Gender and topic [J]. Language in Society, 1987(16):543-557.

二级参考文献44

  • 1张绍杰,王晓彤.“请求”言语行为的对比研究[J].现代外语,1997,20(3). 被引量:130
  • 2许力生.话语风格上的性别差异研究[J].外国语,1997,20(1):43-48. 被引量:101
  • 3[1]Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. Indirectness and politeness in request: same or different? [J]Journal of Pragmatics,1987.
  • 4[2]Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies[M]. Ablex publishing corporation,Norwood. New Jersey, 1989.
  • 5[3]Coats, Jennifer. Women, Men and Language (second edition)[M]. Longman: London,1992.
  • 6[4]Gu, Yueguo. Politeness Phenomena in modern Chinese[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1990.
  • 7[5]Lakoff, R. Language and Woman's Place[M]. New York: Harper and Row,1975.
  • 8[6]Tannen, D. You ,Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation[M]. New York: Bellantantine,1990.
  • 9[7]Tannen, D. Talking From Nine to Five[M]. New York: William Morrow, 1992.
  • 10Eckert, P. & S. McConnell-Ginet. Think practically and look locally:Language and gender as community-based Practice [J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, (21) :461 - 90.

共引文献205

同被引文献180

引证文献18

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部