期刊文献+

北京市大气PM_(2.5)中矿物成分的污染特征 被引量:18

Characteristics of Mineral Component in Ambient PM_(2.5) in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解北京市大气细粒子中矿物成分的浓度水平和污染特征 ,在清华园和车公庄进行了连续 1a的PM2 5累积周采样和全样品分析 .Al、Si、Ca、Mg和Fe等地壳元素的周变化相似 ,最大周均浓度均出现在春季有强沙尘天气的一周 ;其季节变化显著 ,显示季节性的源排放以及气象条件对矿物成分的含量影响显著 .土壤尘的季节平均浓度从夏季逐步上升 ,至次年春季达到最高 (2 1 1 μg·m-3 ) ,表明春季频繁发生的沙尘天气对土壤尘细粒子有重要贡献 .大量的建筑活动可能大大增加了北京细粒子中Ca的负荷 。 To understand the concentration levels and temporal variations of the mineral component of PM 2 5 in the ambient air of Beijing, weeklong samples were simultaneously collected for one year at Qinghuayuan and Chegongzhuang. The concentrations of five major crustal elements Al, Si, Ca, Mg, and Fe exhibited similar significant weekly variations, with their maximum values in the week of a serious dust event in the spring of 2000. Obvious seasonal pattern was also found for these elements, indicating different influences on fine mineral particles from the source emissions and meteorology in different seasons. Soil dust concentration increased from a low level in summer to the peak value (21 1 μg·m -3 ) in spring, suggesting that frequent dust events made a significant contribution to fine soil dust. A large number of construction activities in Beijing substantially increased the loading of fine calcium bearing particles, and their emissions thus need to be further controlled.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期26-30,共5页 Environmental Science
基金 通用汽车 (GM)资助国际合作项目
关键词 矿物成分 地壳元素 土壤尘 PM2.5 污染特征 北京 mineral component crustal elements soil dust PM 2 5 pollution characteristics Beijing
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1]Sokolik I N, Toon O B. Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols [J]. Nature, 1996, 381: 681~683.
  • 2[2]Wilson W. Size distribution of ambient and indoor particles: does the overlap of fine and coarse particles cause problems in the interpretation of research results? Paper presented at PM2000: Particulate Matter and Health-The Scientific Basis for Regulatory Decision Making, Air & Waste Management Association International Specialty Conference, Charleston, SC., January 2000.24~28.
  • 3[3]Kegler S R, Wilson W E, Marcus A H. PM1, Intermodal (PM2.5~1) Mass, and the Soil Component of PM2.5 in Phoenix, AZ, 1995~1996 [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2001, 35: 914~920.
  • 4[4]He K, Yang F, Ma Y, et al. The Characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35: 4959~4970.
  • 5[6]Ye B, Ji X, Yang H, et al. Concentration and chemical composition of PM2.5 in Shanghai for a 1-year period [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37: 499~510.
  • 6[7]Kim B M, Teffera S, Zeldin M D. Characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 in the South Coast Air Basin of southern California: part 1--Spatial variations [J]. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50: 2034~2044.
  • 7[8]Chan Y C, Simpson R W, Mctainsh G H, et al. Characterization of chemical species in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane, Australia [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1997, 31: 3773~3785.
  • 8中国环境监测总站主编.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.400~401.
  • 9[12]Choi J C, Lee M, Chun Y, et al. Chemical composition and source signature of spring aerosol in Seoul, Korea [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, 106(D16): 18067~18074.
  • 10[13]Duce R A, Unni C K, Ray B J, et al. Long-range atmospheric transport of soil dust from Asia to the Tropical North Pacific: temporal variability [J]. Science, 1980, 209: 1522~1524.

共引文献2

同被引文献291

引证文献18

二级引证文献354

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部