期刊文献+

论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外 被引量:199

On Zhongyong Rationality:Beyond instrumental,value,and communicative rationality
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper analyses the zhongyong mode of orientation in the Confucian tradition from a social scientific perspective.It consists of three parts.Part One discusses different types of rationality and then points out that the most fundamental problem inadvanced modern society is what may be called the “paradox of reason”,to which Habermas’ communicative rationality is hardly a practical solution.Part Two portrays zhongyong as a rational mode of orientation,which is neither instrumental\|rational nor value\|rational but a mixture of both.It also argues that zhongyong rationality has greater potential than communicative rationality,as far as offering a solution to the above\|mentioned problem is concerned.Part Three examines the traces of the zhong yong mode of orientation among contemporary Chinese by examining three sets of data,namely,a qualitative study of Confucian entrepreneurs in China's Mainland,Hong Kong,Taiwan,Malaysia and Singapore,a survey study of social values of the residents in five Chinese communities,and a study of conflict resolution among peasants in a village in Guangdong Province. This paper analyses the zhongyong mode of orientation in the Confucian tradition from a social scientific perspective.It consists of three parts.Part One discusses different types of rationality and then points out that the most fundamental problem inadvanced modern society is what may be called the “paradox of reason”,to which Habermas' communicative rationality is hardly a practical solution.Part Two portrays zhongyong as a rational mode of orientation,which is neither instrumental\|rational nor value\|rational but a mixture of both.It also argues that zhongyong rationality has greater potential than communicative rationality,as far as offering a solution to the above\|mentioned problem is concerned.Part Three examines the traces of the zhong yong mode of orientation among contemporary Chinese by examining three sets of data,namely,a qualitative study of Confucian entrepreneurs in China's Mainland,Hong Kong,Taiwan,Malaysia and Singapore,a survey study of social values of the residents in five Chinese communities,and a study of conflict resolution among peasants in a village in Guangdong Province.
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第2期33-48,共16页 Sociological Studies
基金 香港研究资助局拔款资助!(编号 :CUHK32 2 / 95H)
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1杜为.《中庸本义提要》[J].孔孟月刊,1986,24(10).
  • 2冯友兰.1940,《新世训》,上海:开明书店
  • 3葛荣晋.《儒家“中庸概念”的历史演变》[J].哲学与文化,1991,18(9).
  • 4公刘.论"中庸"与"非中庸"[J].新华文摘,1988,(2).
  • 5杭之.《韦伯理论、儒家伦理与经济发展的纠纷》[J].当代,1988,(23).
  • 6黄晒莉.《中国人的和谐观/冲突观:和谐化辩证观之研究途径》[J].本土心理学研究,1996,(5).
  • 7骆承烈.1989.《孔子的思想核心——和》.刊于复旦大学国际交流办公室合编《儒家思想和未来社会》,上海人民出版社.
  • 8罗光.论中庸[J].哲学与文化,1988,(2).
  • 9司徒华.2000,《弘一法师的格言》,刊于《明报》,5月7日,“副刊”版
  • 10寺田隆信著 张正明等译.《山西商人研究》[M].山西人民出版社,1986年版..

同被引文献2439

引证文献199

二级引证文献1484

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部