期刊文献+

竞争情报与商业间谍的分水岭 被引量:6

The Watershed between Competitive Intelligence and Business Spy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在简要回顾和分析微软反垄断案和甲骨文公司“垃圾门”事件的基础上 ,阐述了竞争情报与商业间谍以及经济谍报的界定 ,强调了竞争情报的合法性和道德性。作为企业管理者来说 ,必须严格把握这些原则 ,在市场竞争中正确运用竞争情报 。 Based on a brief review and analysis of the Microsoft Antitrust Case and the Oracle 'Garbage Gate'accident,this paper expounds the difference between competitive intelligence on the one side and business spy and economic espionage on the other side,and emphasizes the legality and morality of competitive intelligence.The managers of enterprises must observe this principle strictly so as to make correct use of competitive intelligence and win more competitive advantages.
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期488-492,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
关键词 竞争情报 商业间谍 反垄断 甲骨文公司 enterprise competitive intelligence comparative study/business spy economic espionage
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Thomas A H. Oracle vs Microsoft: Corporate Espionage or Competitive Intelligence?.Business and Society Review, 2002, 107 (4):501-511.
  • 2唐绮.微软帝国依然屹立—微软反垄断案始末[J].南方企业家,2002(5):36-39. 被引量:1
  • 3Brinkley J.Microsoft Breakup Is Ordered for Antitrust Law Violations. The New York Times.2000-06-08.
  • 4Bloomherg News: Oracle Hired Detective to Investigate Microsoft Allies. http: //technews.netscape.com/news/0-1003-200-2165103.html.2000-06-28.
  • 5Wong W. Oracle Chief Defends Microsoft Snooping. http: //technews. netseape.com/news/0-1003-200-2167548.html,2000-06-28.
  • 6Lauria J.Oracle Caper Lifts Lid on America's Corporate Spies.http://www.Sunday-tim.sti/2000/07/09/stibusnws02010.html,2000-07-09
  • 7The Independent Institute. Statement from the Independent Institute on Oracle's Sponsorship of Smear Campaign: Facts Refute Oracle CEO's Wild Claims That Institute Is a "Front Group" That Received"Secret Funding" from Microsoft. http: //www.independent.org/tii/news/000628statement.html,2000-06-28.
  • 8McCullagh D.MS Espionage:Cash for Trash.http://wired.com/news/print/0,1294,37022.00.html,2000-06-15
  • 9杨昌作,段燕.微软VS甲骨文[J].知识经济,2000(8):62-64. 被引量:1
  • 10Association for Competitive Technology. Association for Competitive Technology Calls on Oracle for Apology. http: //www. actonline.org/press_room/releases/062800.asp, 2000-06-28.

同被引文献176

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部