期刊文献+

脑肿瘤动态增强MRI与血管生成的对照研究 被引量:4

Comparative study between dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and vascularity of brain tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨动态增强MRI评价脑肿瘤血管生成的价值。方法 对 3 9例脑肿瘤动态增强MRI及病理资料进行对照研究。绘制动态图像信号强度 时间曲线 ,计算首过斜率、渗透斜率 ;肿瘤行MVD和VEGF检测。结果 各级脑肿瘤MVD值有上升趋势 ,但差异无显著性意义 ;VEGF表达差异有显著性意义。首过斜率与MVD及组织学分级成正相关。渗透斜率与VEGF成弱相关 ;渗透斜率与组织学分级成正相关 ,各级间差异有显著性意义。结论 动态增强MRI可较好地评价脑肿瘤血管生成特性。 Objective To explore the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in brain tumors grading, and to assess tumor vascularity of brain tumors. Methods Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathological findings of 39 cases of brain tumors were analyzed. The contrast agent was Gd-DTPA with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. The 3D-FLASH sequence were performed with the following parameters: 22/6 ms (TR/TE), 5 mm section thickness, and acquisition time of 25 seconds per volume of 8 slices. The sequences were acquired 12 times immediately after intravenous bolus administration of contrast agent. Signal intensity values measured over time in regions of interest (ROIs), and vessels were analyzed to produce the curve. The first-pass slope and permeability slope were calculated from the data. Microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein expression in all cases were examined. Results Histological examination revealed 13 grade Ⅳ, 13 grade Ⅲ, 11 grade Ⅱ, 2 grade Ⅰ among the 39 cases. Despite a tendency up in different grades, there was no statistically significant among values of MVD in any of groups ( P >0.05). Differences of the VEGF expressions from different grades were statistically significant ( P <0.05). There was a positive correlation ( r=0.549,P =0.001) between first-pass slope and the values of MVD and also a positive correlation( r=0.469,P =0.005) between first-pass slope and tumor grade. One way analysis of variance showed that differences of first-pass slope were statistically significant in different grades ( F=4.097,P =0.027). There was a weak correlation ( r=0.385,P =0.016) between permeability slope and VEGF expressions, but a strong correlation ( r=0.553,P =0.00026) between permeability slope and tumor grades. One way analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences of permeability slope in different grades( F=6.442,P = 0.001 ). Conclusion Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging can assess the vascularity of brain tumors nicely, not only the blood supply of tumors, but also the permeability of the microvessels. This technique has a good prospect in clinical utilization for tumor grading and prognosis.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 2004年第9期1350-1354,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 脑肿瘤 动态增强 磁共振成像 病理学 微血管密度 血管内皮生长因子 Brain neoplasms Dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic resonance imaging Pathology Microvessel density Vascular endothelial growth factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Leon SP, Folkerth RD, Black PM. Microvessel density is a prognostic indicator for patients with astroglial brain tumor[J]. Cancer, 1996,77(2):362-372.
  • 2Abdulrauf SI, Edvardsen K, Ho KL, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and vascular density as prognostic markers of survival in patients with low-grade astrocytoma[J]. J Neurosurg, 1998,88(3):513-520.
  • 3Weidner N. Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer[J]. Am J Pathol,1995,147(1):9-19.
  • 4Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications[J]. N Engl J Med,1971,285(21):1182-1186.
  • 5Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis[J]. Cell,1996,86(3):353-364.
  • 6Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings[J]. Radiology, 1994,191(1):41-51.
  • 7Roberts TPL, Chuang N, Roberts HC. Neuroimaging: do we really need new contrast agents for MRI[J]? European Journal of Radiology,2000,34(3):166-178.
  • 8Roberts HC, Roberts TPL, Brasch RC, et al. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2000, 21(5):891-899.
  • 9Roberts TPL. Physiologic measurements by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: expectations and limitations[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,1997,7(1):82-90.
  • 10Demsar F, Roberts TPL, Schwickert HC, et al. A MRI spatial mapping technique for microvascular permeability and tissue blood volume based on macromolecular contrast agent distribution[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1997,37(2):236-242.

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部