期刊文献+

钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较 被引量:93

Treatment of ureteral calculi:comparison between ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的有效性和安全性。 方法 采用输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石 15 9例 16 8侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 76侧 ,<1cm者 92侧。ESWL治疗输尿管结石 319例 334侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 14 3侧 ,<1cm者 191侧。比较两组手术时间 结石排净率 手术并发症发生率指标的差异。 结果 对直径≥ 1cm和 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术治疗平均手术时间分别为 5 8min和 4 3min ,短于ESWL的平均手术时间 6 8min和 5 6min(P <0 .0 1) ;钬激光碎石术对直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石 3个月结石排净率为 92 % ,高于ESWL的 6 1% (P <0 .0 1) ;对直径 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术和ESWL的 3个月结石排净率分别为 95 %和 85 % (P >0 .0 5 )。钬激光碎石术组并发症发生率为 4 .8%( 8/ 16 8) ,ESWL组无明显并发症发生。 结论 输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石疗效明显优于ESWL ,而直径 <1cm的结石二者疗效差异无显著性 ,ESWL为直径 Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral calculi. Methods 159 patients (168 sides) underwent ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,including 76 sides of calculi 1 cm or greater and 92 sides of calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.319 patients (334 sides) underwent ESWL,including 143 sides of calculi 1 cm or greater and 191 sides of calculi less than 1 cm.The operation time,stone free rate and incidence rate of complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results The mean operation time of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater and less than 1 cm was 58 min and 43 min,respectively,which were shorter than 68 min and 56 min with ESWL (both P <0.01). The stone free rate after 3 months in patients with 1 cm or greater stone was 92% for ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy. It was higher than 61% with ESWL ( P <0.01). As for calculi less than 1 cm, the stone free rate with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and ESWL were 95% and 85%,respectively ( P >0.05).The complication rate was 4.8% (8/168) in the group of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,while in ESWL group no complication occurred. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater in diameter is more effective than ESWL,but no difference between the 2 groups for calculi less than 1 cm.ESWL can be used as the first line therapy for calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第10期691-693,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 钬激光碎石 治疗 输尿管结石 ESWL 手术时间 体外冲击波碎石术 输尿管镜 直径 结论 差异 Lithotripsy,laser Holmium Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ehreth JT, Drach GW,Arnett ML,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: multicenter study of kidney and upper ureters versus middle and lower ureters treatments. J Urol, 1994,152:1379-1383.
  • 2Farsi HM,Mosli HA,Alzimaity M,et al. In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for primary ureteric calculi. Urology, 1994,43:776-779.
  • 3Matin TV,Sosa RE. Shock wave lithotripsy. In :Walsh PC, Retik AB,Vaughan ED,et al. eds. Campbells Urology, vol. 3.7th ed. Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders, 1998. 2735.
  • 4Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size,and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 5Pace DT,Weir MJ,Tariq N,et al. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment. J Urol,2000,164:1905-1909.
  • 6Thomas R, Macaluso JN, Vandenberg T, et al. An innovative approach to management of lower ureteral calculi. J Urol, 1993,149:1427 -1429.
  • 7Anderson KR,Keetch DW,Albala DM,et al. Optimal therapy for the distal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy. J Urol, 1994,152:62-64.
  • 8Coz F,Orvieto M, Bustos M,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of 2000 uinary calculi with the Modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol,2000,14:239.
  • 9Tawfiek ER,Bagley DH. Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniques. Urology, 1999,53:25-26.
  • 10Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic stone retrival:rigid vs flexible endoscopes.Semin Urol,1990,12:32-34.

二级参考文献4

共引文献201

同被引文献534

引证文献93

二级引证文献454

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部