摘要
交通肇事后逃逸是交通肇事罪中的多发现象 ,为刑事司法与理论关注的焦点。但是在不同情况下 ,“逃逸”的刑法意义并不相同 ,刑法第 1 3 3条和 2 0 0 0年 1 1月 1 0日通过的《最高人民法院关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》中 ,总共包括了四种情形的“逃逸” ,分清这几种情况下的“逃逸” 。
Escaping from the accident site of causing traffic trouble is the usual phenomena in crime of causing traffic casualties, which has become the focus being paid close attention to by criminal judicature and theory. But under different circumstances, the criminal meaning of “escaping” is not identical, in Article 133 of PRC Criminal Law and The Supreme People's Court Interpretation of Certain Problems Regarding the Concrete Application of Law in Adjudicating the Criminal Cases Arising from Causing Traffic Casualties adopted on November 10, 2000, include four types of “escaping” behavior altogether, if they have been distinguished from each other which will be of great importance for judicial practice.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第1期66-70,共5页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law