啖赵《春秋》学派略论

Study on the DAN-ZHAOChunqiu school

啖助、赵匡、陆淳是中唐开风气之先的《春秋》经传学的新派代表人物。三人关系当以吕温《代国子陆博士进集注春秋表》所述最为明当。啖助、赵匡二人著述不传,陆淳《春秋》学著述至今保存得相当完整。《春秋集传纂例》十卷相当集中地保存了啖赵学派的学术宗旨。啖赵认为三传均未达《春秋》深指,圣人笔意;三传互有得失,《左传》叙事详备,《公》、《谷》二传则传经密于《左传》,同时穿凿附会也甚于《左传》;“左氏非丘明”,绝不与与孔子同时,亦不受经于孔子。啖赵《春秋》学派对当时以及后世都产生了很大影响,这是毋庸置疑的,而对其评价则因时因人而异。舍传求经,自出机杼,很能概括啖赵学派的基本风格。

DAN Zhu,ZHAO Kuang and LU Chun are the new group representative figures ofChunqiu school in Tang Dynasty that Chunqiu classics and commentaries learn first to turn on atmosphere.LU chuns Chunqiu works are preserved quite intact while neither DAN Zhu’s works nor ZHAO Kuang’s works handed down.The tenth volume ofChunqiu collections has totally preserved the academic purpose of DAN-Zhao school.DAN-ZHAO think three commentaries have both gain and loss,Zuo-shi is not Zuo Qiu-ming.It is the unquestionable fact that the Dan-Zhao Chunqiu school made a notable impact both at that time and later ages but the appraisal of it is quite different from different people and different time.Giving up commentaries for classics and Being original in conceptio are the basic style of DAN-ZHAO school.