3种提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA的方法比较

Compare with the three methods of DNA extraction of sweat latent fingerprint on the adhesive side of tapes

目的比较胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA提取的方法。方法分别采用硅珠法、QIAMicrokit法、硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面的汗潜指印中DNA,STR复合扩增,荧光电泳检测。结果用QIAMicrokit法、硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA,检测成功率分别为21%和36%。硅珠法检测未获成功。结论硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中的DNA比QIAMicrokit法,检验时间更短,检测成功率更高。

Objective To comparatively analyze the DNA extracted from sweat latent fingerprints on the adhesive side of tapes by three kinds of methods. Methods DNA was extracted from sweat latent fingerprint on the adhesive side of tapes using silicon bead test,QIA micro Kit and combined silicon bead-QIA micro Kit. STR loci were detected by multiplex PCR procedures. The PCR product was electrophoresed on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer. Results 36%of the sweat latent fingerprints on the adhesive side of tapes was successfully genotyped using combined silicon bead-QIA micro Kit, and 21% using QIA micro Kit. Conclusion DNA genotyping of the sweat latent fingerprints on the adhesive side of tapes reveals higher possibility using combined silicon bead-QIA micro Kit than using QIA micro Kit and is less time-consuming.