期刊文献+

应用微波与激光治疗子宫颈糜烂的对比观察 被引量:122

A comparable study of microwave tissue coagu-lation (MTC) and CO_2 laser in treatment ofcervical erosion
原文传递
导出
摘要 将300例慢性宫颈炎妇女随机分为微波组和激光组,分别采用微波组织凝固和CO_2激光汽化进行治疗。结果:微波治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率92.20%(142/154),CO_2激光一次治愈率79.45%(116/146)。两组治疗结果比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.005)。两组治疗后的不良反应大致相同,术中出血的发生率,微波组3.25%(5/154),明显低于激光组21.92%(32/146),差异有非常显著意义(P<0.005)。研究结果表明:微波组织凝固技术治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率高,术中止血效果好,操作简单,有实用价值。 n a randomized study, 300 patients with cervicalerosion were allocated to either MTC(154) orCO, Laser(146). The patients were treated on anoutbatient basis without anesthesia. In the case of ini-tial treatment failure the same method was to be usedfor retreatment. All the patients were followed-up foran average of 11 weeks(8- 12). 142 of 154microwave coagulated patients(92.20%) and 1 16 of146 Laserevaporated patients (79.45%) were curedafter one treatment, and there was significant diffe-rence between MTC and Laser group (P<0.005).Bleeding during operation occurred in 5 of 154 MTCgroup (3.25%) and 32 of 146 Laser group (21.92%)(p m 0.005). The result suggested that MTC had highercure rate and less complications. It is easy to handle.safe and economic.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1994年第1期19-22,共4页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 微波 激光疗法 子宫颈炎 Microwave Laser Cervicitis
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1孙炳照,国外医学物理医学与康复学分册,1992年,12卷,111页
  • 2江森,实用妇科与产科杂志,1991年,7卷,287页
  • 3张俊发,铁道医学,1991年,19卷,118页
  • 4张苗苗,中华妇产科杂志,1991年,26卷,239页
  • 5林庚金,内镜临床应用进展,1991年
  • 6郑怀美,妇产科学(第3版),1990年
  • 7董榕,福建医药杂志,1988年,10卷,2页
  • 8李国庆,国外医学外科学分册,1988年,1卷,9页
  • 9张志宏,中华内科杂志,1988年,27卷,483页
  • 10王秀玲,中华内科杂志,1986年,25卷,269页

同被引文献292

引证文献122

二级引证文献412

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部