摘要
将300例慢性宫颈炎妇女随机分为微波组和激光组,分别采用微波组织凝固和CO_2激光汽化进行治疗。结果:微波治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率92.20%(142/154),CO_2激光一次治愈率79.45%(116/146)。两组治疗结果比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.005)。两组治疗后的不良反应大致相同,术中出血的发生率,微波组3.25%(5/154),明显低于激光组21.92%(32/146),差异有非常显著意义(P<0.005)。研究结果表明:微波组织凝固技术治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率高,术中止血效果好,操作简单,有实用价值。
n a randomized study, 300 patients with cervicalerosion were allocated to either MTC(154) orCO, Laser(146). The patients were treated on anoutbatient basis without anesthesia. In the case of ini-tial treatment failure the same method was to be usedfor retreatment. All the patients were followed-up foran average of 11 weeks(8- 12). 142 of 154microwave coagulated patients(92.20%) and 1 16 of146 Laserevaporated patients (79.45%) were curedafter one treatment, and there was significant diffe-rence between MTC and Laser group (P<0.005).Bleeding during operation occurred in 5 of 154 MTCgroup (3.25%) and 32 of 146 Laser group (21.92%)(p m 0.005). The result suggested that MTC had highercure rate and less complications. It is easy to handle.safe and economic.
出处
《中华妇产科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1994年第1期19-22,共4页
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology