学习风格与学习成绩的相关分析被引量：42

Correlation Analysis on Learning Strategy And Test Results

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文应用对西安交通大学2394名一年级工科大学生的调查数据,分析了工科大学生学习风格与学习成绩的关系。结果表明,两者工科大学生的学生风格与其学习结果之间存在着非常密切的关系:一方面,学习风格的各个组成部分与学习成绩之间存在显著的关系;另一方面,采用不同类型学习风格学习的学生,其学习成绩是不一样的。这表明,工科大学生的学习风格对其学习质量具有决定性的影响。我们要提高工科大学生的学习质量,就必须转变其学习风格。

作者陆根书

机构地区西安交通大学高等教育研究所

出处《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期44-48,共5页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering

关键词学习风格学习成绩相关分析工科大学生西安交通大学调查数据学习结果组成部分学习质量一年级决定性

分类号 G642.0 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Van Rossum, E. J. & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The Relationship Between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome.Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 54, 73 ～ 83.
2Biggs, J. B. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby (ed.).Cognitive strategies and educational performance. New York: Academic Press.
3Marton, F. (1983). Beyond individual differences. Educational Psychology, 3, 287～303.
4Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. Br. J. Educ.Psychol., 46, 128-148.
5Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning styles of college students. In R.Dillon & R. R.Schmeck(eds). Individual Differences in Cognition.Vol. 1. NY: Academic Press.
6Entwistle, N. J.and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
7Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
8Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie,W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801 ～ 813.
9Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257～280.
10Snowman, J. (1986). Learning Tactics and Strategices. In G. D.Phye and T. Andre (eds). Cognitive Instructional Psychology:Components of Classroom Learning. New York: Acadmic Press;Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257～280.

二级参考文献18

1[1]林毓琦.大学学习学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1999.
2[3]Grigerenko, E. L. and Sternberg, R. J. Thinking styles. In Saklofske, D. H. and Zeidner, M. (eds.). International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence[ M ]. Plenum Press, 1995. 205 -230.
3[4]Pask,G.Styles and Strategies of Learning[J] .Br.J.Educ. Psy chol, 1976, (46): 128 - 148.
4[5]Gregorc, A. R. Style Delineator[ M]. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Sys tems, 1982.
5[6]S? lj?,R. Learning in the learners' perspective(I):some com monsense conceptions[ R]. Reports from the Departnent of Edu cation, University of G. teborg, No. 76,1979.
6[7]Marton, F. and Saljo, R. Approaches to learning. In Marton, F. et al. (eds.). The experience of learning[ M]. Edinburgh: Scot tish Academic Press, 1984.
7[8]Van Rossum, E.J. & Schenk, S. M. The Relationship Between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome [ J ]. Br. J. Educ. Psycho0. , 1984,(54):73-83.
8[9]Biggs, J. B. Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby ( ed. ). Cognitive strategies and educational performance [ M ]. New York: Aca demic Press, 1984.
9[10]Taylor, E. M. Orientation to study: a longitudinal investigation of two degree courses in one university[ R]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, UK, 1983.
10[11]Bandura,A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action:A Social Cognitive Theory [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.