期刊文献+

补贴对林业生产及森林生态效益影响的经济学分析:一个定量分析模型 被引量:20

An Economic Analysis of the Effect of Subsidies on Forestry and Forest Ecological Benefit: A Quantitative Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不同的林业补贴产生不同的效果:可能提高社会福利,也可能降低社会福利。出现这种差别的原因是补贴使林业生产收益流发生了变化,从而使得林业生产收益最大净现值到来的时间相对于社会最优时间提前或延后。论文建立了一个以林木吸收碳来衡量森林生态效益的林业生产收益定量模型,并通过该模型对华东某市的一项林场补贴政策进行分析。分析结果是,在没有补贴的情况下,该林场最优砍伐时间为第19年,当存在补贴的情况下,林场的最优砍伐时间提前到第11年,而随着碳价格从0增加至1000元/t,社会最优砍伐时间从第19年增加到第31年,造成的社会净损失从7750元/hm2增加到17704元/hm2。鉴于此,合理的林业补贴要能够促使私人效益与社会效益相统一。 To encourage afforestation and improve the social welfare,governments provide subs-i-dies to support the forestry.Different types of subsidies give different results.Some can improve the social welfare,but the others cannot.The reason is that the subsidy changes the benefit and cost cash flow during the farmers'planting process and influences the time that maximizes the net present value of the farmers,which causes the optimal harvest time delayed or ahead to the social one.In order to distinguish the different effects,this paper sets up a quantitative model for forestry management,which includes the social benefit due to carbon sequestration of forest.Then the model is employed to analyze a subsidy provided by a city government in East China to support a local forest farm.The result shows the optimal harvesting age excluding social benefits is 19 years.When including social benefits,the optimal harvesting age increases from 19 year to 31 years as the carbon price rises from 0 yuan/t to 1 000 yuan/t.The inclusion of subsidies to encourage afforestation shortens the optimal harvesting age to 11 years from the forest owner's point of view.Compared with no subsidy,the subsidy causes much more social loss,which increases from 7 750 yuan/t to 17 704 yuan/t.The reason is that the subsidy brings forward the optimal harvest time,and the farm owner will not concern the externalities of the forest.The result indicates that not only to consider the social benefit but also to maximize the net social present value is important to a reasonable forestry subsidy.
作者 谭荣 曲福田
出处 《自然资源学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期605-612,共8页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金(70425002) 教育部"高等学校青年教师教学科研奖励计划"。
关键词 林业补贴 森林生态效益 最优砍伐决策模型 定量分析 forestry subsidy ecology benefit of forest optimal harvest model quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1孙惠南.近20年来关于森林作用研究的进展[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(5):407-412. 被引量:26
  • 2Winjum J K,Brown S,Schlamandinger B.Forest harvest and wood products:sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide[J].Forest Science,1998,44:272~284.
  • 3Guy R,Benowicz A.Can afforestation contribute to a reduction in Canada's net CO2 emissions?A report prepared for the Canadian Pulp and Paper Association[R].British Columbia: University of British Columbia,1998.
  • 4V C Tassone,Justus Wesseler,Francesco S Nesci. Diverging incentives for afforestation from carbon sequestration:an economic analysis of the EU afforestation program in the south of Italy[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2002,(1):567~578.
  • 5Van Kooten G C,Binkley C S,Delcourt G.Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services[J].A merican Journal of Agricultural Economics,1995,77:365~374.
  • 6类似的研究结果可见V C Tassone.et al.(2002)[4],Van Kooten,et al.(1995)[6].

二级参考文献14

  • 1黄秉维.确切地估计森林的作用[J].地理知识,1981,(1):1-5.
  • 2黄秉维.再谈森林的作用[J].地理知识,1982,(2):1-3.
  • 3刘巽浩,中国农业资源与区划,2000年,4期,8页
  • 4周晓峰,森林生态功能与经营途径,1999年,67,198页
  • 5周晓峰,中国森林与生态环境,1999年,100页
  • 6Klas Sandstrm,AMBIO-人类环境杂志,1998年,27卷,2期,132页
  • 7马雪华,森林水文学,1993年,257,288页
  • 8黄秉维,地理知识,1982年,2期,1页
  • 9黄秉维,地理知识,1982年,4期,1页
  • 10黄秉维,地理知识,1982年,30卷,3期,1页

共引文献25

同被引文献280

引证文献20

二级引证文献410

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部