期刊文献+

拜新同与依苏治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较

Comparison of the effects of adalat GITS and yisu in primary hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察拜新同与依苏治疗原发性高血压的临床疗效.方法:54例原性高血压患者随机分为依苏组(27例),口服依苏每次10~20mg,每日1次;拜新同组(27例),口服拜新同30~60mg,每日1次,共服用4周.结果:两组治疗一个疗程后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)均明显下降(P<0.05),两组血压下降幅度差异无显著性(P>0.05).结论:拜新同与低苏均可控制原发性高血压,不良反应少.
作者 胡茂子
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2005年第16期2116-2117,共2页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1吴兆苏,姚崇华,赵冬,吴桂贤,王薇,刘静,曾哲淳,吴英恺.我国多省市心血管病趋势及决定因素的人群监测(中国MONICA方案)Ⅰ.发病率和死亡率监测结果[J].中华心血管病杂志,1997,25(1):6-11. 被引量:205
  • 2[1]Morris JB,Christopher R,Alain C,et al.Morbidity and mortality in patients randomized to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the international nifedipine GITS study:intervention as a goal in hypertension treatment (INSIGHT).Lancet,2000,356:366-3 72.
  • 3[2]Collins R,Peto R,MacMahon S,et al.Blood pressure,stroke and coronary heart disease,part 2 short-term reductions in blood pressure:ove rview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet,1990,32 5:827-838.
  • 4[3]Ramsay LE,Williams B,Johnston GD,et al.British Hyperte nsion Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999,summary.Br Med J,1999, 319:630-635.
  • 5[4]Brown MJ,Castaigne A,Deleeuw PW,et al.Influence of dia betes and type of hypertension on the response to antihypertensive treatment.Hyp ertension,2000,35:1038-1042.
  • 6[5]Pahor M,Guralnik JM,Corti MC,et al.Long-term surviva l and use of antihypertensive medications in older persons.J Am Geriatr Soc,1995 ,43:1191-1197.
  • 7[6]Pahor M,Guralnik JM,Ferruci L,et al.Calcium-channel blockade and incidence of cancer in aged populations.Lancet,1996,348:493-499.
  • 8[7]Gress TW,Nieto FJ,Shahar E,et al.Hypertension and anti hypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus.N Engl J Med,2 000,342:905-912.
  • 9[1]Goa K, Wagstaff AJ, Losartan potassium. A review of itspharmacology,clinical efficacy and tolerability in themanagement of hypertension[J].Drugs,1996,51:820-845.
  • 10[2]The SAMPLE Study Group.Ambulatory blood pressure is superiorto clinic blood pressure in predicting treatme-nt-inducedregression of left ventricular hypertrophy[J].Circulation,1997,95:1 464-1 470.

共引文献1510

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部