期刊文献+

属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策方法 被引量:43

Method for Interval Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Problem with Incomplete Attribute Weights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对属性权重信息不完全且属性值以区间数形式给出的多属性决策问题,提出了一种逼近于理想点(TOPSIS)的决策分析方法.首先对属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策问题进行了描述;然后依据传统的,TOPSIS方法的基本思路,给出了解决属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策问题的计算步骤,其核心是通过构建并求解二次规划模型,得到每个方案与正理想点、负理想点的差异值,进而计算出每个方案与理想点的相对接近度,即可得到所有方案的排序结果. 最后通过给出一个算例说明了该方法. With respect to the problem of multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete information on attribute weights to which the attribute values are given in terms of interval numbers, a modified TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) analysis is proposed. Describing briefly the problem discussed, the conventional TOPSIS is based on to give the calculation steps to solve it. As the key step, a quadratic programming model is developed to determine the deviation values between every alternative and positive ideal point or negative ideal point. Then, according to the deviations, the relative accessibility to the ideal point is calculated for each and every planning to rank all alternatives. A numerical example is given to illustrate how to use the proposed method.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期798-800,共3页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70371050)教育部高等学校优秀青年教师教学科研奖励计划资助项目(教人司[2002]123)教育部高等学校博士学科点专项基金资助项目(20040145018)辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目(20032028).
关键词 多属性决策 属性权重 不完全信息 区间数 TOPSIS 二次规划 multiple attribute decision-making attribute weight incomplete information interval number TOPSIS quadratic programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1樊治平,张全,马建.多属性决策中权重确定的一种集成方法[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(3):50-53. 被引量:87
  • 2徐泽水.部分权重信息下多目标决策方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(1):43-47. 被引量:79
  • 3Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.1-10.
  • 4Park K S, Kim S H, Yoon W C. Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,96(2):398-406.
  • 5Lee K S, Park K S, Eum Y S, et al. Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,134(3):557-563.
  • 6Miettinen K, Salminien P. Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,119(1):50-60.
  • 7Takeda E, Satoh J. A data envelopment analysis approach to multicriteria decision problems with incomplete information[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2000,39(9-10):81-90.
  • 8王坚强.信息不完全的多准则决策的SIR方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9):1205-1208. 被引量:15
  • 9Kim S H, Han C H. An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making procedure with incomplete information[J]. Computers & Operational Research, 1999,26(8):755-772.
  • 10Goh C H, Tung Y C A, Cheng C H. A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1996,30(2):193-199.

二级参考文献25

  • 1王应明,傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策,1993,8(1):25-29. 被引量:70
  • 2严鸿和,陈玉祥,许昭明,杨皖苏.专家评分机理与最优综合评价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(2):19-23. 被引量:77
  • 3陈Ting.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 4Roy B, Present M, Silhol D. A Programming Method for Determining with Pries Metro Stations Should Renovated[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1986,24(2) :318 - 334.
  • 5Dias L C, Joaon C. ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2000,9:355 - 377.
  • 6Juan C, Edurdo F. A New Method for Group Decision Support Based on ELECTRE Ⅲ Methodology[J]. European Journal of Operation Research,2003,148:14-27.
  • 7Dias L C, Mousseau V, Figueira J. An Aggregation/Disaggregation Approach to Obtain Robust Conclusions with ELECTRE TRI[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2002,138:332- 348.
  • 8Mousseau V, Slowinski R. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Mdels from Assignment Examples[J]. J. Global Optimization, 1998,12:157- 174.
  • 9Mousseau V, Figueira J, Naux J. Using Assignment Examples to Infer Weights for ELECTRE TRI Method: Some Experiments Results[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2001,130:263 -275.
  • 10Takeda E. A Method for Multiple Pseudo-Criteria Decision Problem[J].Computers & Operations Research, 2001,28:1427- 1439.

共引文献174

同被引文献440

引证文献43

二级引证文献265

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部