RANGE在二语产出性词汇评估中的应用被引量：34

Use of RANGE in Assessing L2 Productive Vocabulary

导出

摘要产出性词汇评估是词汇习得研究的一个重要方面.以词频为基础设计出的词汇统计软件程序一RANGE为产出性词汇的自动评估提供了一个有效的手段.它的作用主要包括分析比较不同文本的词汇量大小、措辞的异同和词汇的过度使用倾向等. Assessing productive vocabulary is an important dimension of vocabulary acquisition research. Based on word frequency, RANGE, a program for vocabulary statistics, provides an effective way of automatically assessing productive vocabulary. The program facilitates a comparison of the vocabulary sizes and diction among texts and an analysis of the word overuse in certain texts.

作者鲍贵王霞

机构地区南京政治学院外语教研室青岛理工大学

出处《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 2005年第4期54-58,共5页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education

关键词 RANGE 产出词汇词频措辞过度使用 RANGE Productive vocabulary Word frequency Diction Overuse

分类号 H313 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1Cobb, T. (2003). Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies [ J ].Canadian Modem Language Review, 59 ( 3 ).
2Laufer, B. (1994). The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? [ [ J ] RELC Journal,25.
3Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production [J]. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3).
4Leech, G., Rayson, P. and Wilson, A. (2001). Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English [ M ]. London:Pearson Education Limited.
5Nation, P. and Coxhead, A. (2002). RANGE. http://www. vuw. ac. nz/lals/staff/Paul_Nation.
6Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7Richards, J.C. , Platt, J. and Platt, H. (2002). Longman Dictionary of language Teaching & Applied Linguistics[ M].Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
8濮建忠,闵行,东川路,800号.中国学生英语动词语法和词汇型式使用特点初探[J].现代外语,2000,23(1):24-44. 被引量：62
9文秋芳,丁言仁,王文宇.中国大学生英语书面语中的口语化倾向——高水平英语学习者语料对比分析[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(4):268-274. 被引量：366

二级参考文献13

1马广惠.中美大学生英语作文语言特征的对比分析[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):45-49. 被引量：142
2张淑静.中国英语专业学生make的使用特点调查报告[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(4):58-63. 被引量：82
3冯志伟.自然语言的计算机处理[J].中文信息,1997,14(4):26-27. 被引量：18
4Altenberg, B. & M. Tapper. 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners' written English [A]. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 80-93.
5Cobb, T. 2002. Analyze late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review (In press).
6Granger, S (ed.). 1998. Learner English on Computer [C]. London & New York: Longman.
7Lorenz, G. 1998. Overstatement in advanced learners'writing stylistic aspects of adjective intensification [A]. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 53-66.
8Petch-Tyson, S. 1998. Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse [A]. In S. Granger ( ed. ).Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 107-118.
9Reppen, R. 1994. Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective [D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
10Shaw, P. & E. Liu. 1998. What develops in the development of second-langnage writing? [J] Applied Linguistics 19: 225-254.