期刊文献+

钼靶结合MRI对乳腺导管原位癌诊断价值的探讨 被引量:17

Diagnostic value of combined mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析乳腺导管原位癌的X线及MRI表现,评价钼靶结合MRI对DCIS术前诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析经手术病理证实的乳腺DCIS病例13例,所有病例均于术前行动态增强MRI和钼靶X线检查,同时行免疫组化标记。结果:①将病灶的X线表现分成恶性钙化、中间性钙化和非钙化3组,PR与C-erbB-2在3组中的分布有统计性意义(P<0.05);②13例病灶中11例MR表现为非肿块样强化,以BI-RADS分级中的4、5级为MR和X线检查的阳性指标,其正确诊断率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:DCIS的钼靶X线表现可以作为乳腺DCIS的预后因子,乳腺MRI对导管原位癌及导管原位癌伴微浸润有特征性表现,钼靶X线和MR检查相结合能提高早期导管原位癌的检出率及正确诊断率。 Objective:To retrospectively evaluate the mammographic and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) features of breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) and to access diagnostic accuracy of MRI combined with mammography in preoperative assessment of DCIS.Methods:Results of MRI and mammography from 13 women with known breast DCIS were analyzed,and then compared with pathologic examination.The prognostic biologic factors including progesterone receptor(PR),C-erbB-2 were evaluated in 13 cases.Results:① For expression profile of the biological factors,significant differences were found among malignant calcification group,intermediate concern calcification group,and non-calcification group(P<0.05);② 11 lesions showed non-mass-like enhancement on dynamic breast MRI.Regarding the BI-RADS IV or V as the positive standard,the difference was not significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Mammographic findings could be a prognostic marker.The MR imaging features of DCIS were characteristic.Combined with mammography,MRI increases the diagnoses of DCIS and diagnostic accuracy.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2012年第2期208-211,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 上海市重点学科建设项目资助(编号:S30203) 上海交通大学医学院重点学科
关键词 乳腺 导管原位癌 磁共振成像 钼靶X线 Breast Ductal carcinoma in situ Magnetic resonance imaging Mammography
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1American College of Radiology (ACR).Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).3th ed.Reston: Am College Radiol,1998.1-90.
  • 2Mandelson MT,Oestreicher N,Porter PL,et al.Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92:1081-1087.
  • 3Sickles EA.Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results of 3184 consecutive cases.Radiology,1991,179:463-468.
  • 4Varas X,Leborgne F,Leborgne JH.Nonpalpable,probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.Radiology,1992,184:409-414.
  • 5Liberman L,Abramson AF,Squires FB,et al.The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.AJR,1998,171:35-40.
  • 6Sickles EA.Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology,1999,213:11-14.
  • 7Feig SA.Ductal carcinoma in situ: implications for screening mammography.Radiol Clin North Am,2000,38:653-668.
  • 8Franquet T,De Miguel C,Cozcolluela R,et al.Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.Radiographics,1993,13:841-852.
  • 9Uchiyama N,Miyakawa K,Moriyama N,et al.Radilgraphic features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Radiat Med,2001,19:19-25.
  • 10Orel SG,Kay N,Reynolds C,et al.BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.Radiology,1999,211:845-850.

共引文献45

同被引文献114

引证文献17

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部