摘要
在磁浮列车系统研究领域中,为简化计算许多文献将悬浮控制器等效为弹簧阻尼器。而对该方法的有效性,及其结果的可信度都没有做出进一步的分析。从数学模型上分析了弹簧阻尼器系统与控制系统的本质区别,并从稳定性、动态响应特征以及高频激励响应三个方面讨论了这种区别对系统性能的影响。以国防科大磁悬浮列车为被控对象进行了仿真分析,验证了两者之间的差异,说明弹簧阻尼器与控制器是不等效的。
In the area of maglev train system research, the suspension controllers are substituted by spring-dampers for the sake of simplifieation in a lot of documents. However the validity of this method and the reliability of the results have not been further analyzed. This paper analyzes the essential difference between the spring-damper and controller through the mathematical model, discusses its influence on the system performance from three factors: stability, dynamic responding ctaracteristics and high frequency response. Based on the mid-test train of the National University of Defense Technology, a simulation is done to validate the difference between the springdamper and controller. In conclusion, the paper demonstrates the substitution is nonequivalent.
出处
《国防科技大学学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第4期101-105,共5页
Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(60404003)
霍英东教育基金优选资助课题(94028)
湖南省自然科学基金资助项目
关键词
弹簧阻尼器
磁悬浮
频域分析法
等效性
spring-damper
maglev train
frequency analysis
equivalency