摘要
目的对比压缩雾化、超声雾化与简易雾化对呼吸道排痰的疗效。方法选择痰液重度黏稠,不能自行顺利咳出,伴有咳嗽的呼吸道疾病患者84例,随机分为3组。每组均常规给予抗生素,分别给予压缩雾化、超声雾化和简易雾化治疗。结果经统计学处理,3种方法的疗效差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论压缩雾化与简易雾化相比依从性增加、副反应少、疗效上升;与超声雾化相比更简单、便携、药液丢失少,故临床上对呼吸道排痰可首选压缩雾化。
Objective To compare the effect of compressed,ultrasonic and simplified nebulization on sputum excretion. Methods 84 patients with respiratory system disease who had ropy sputum and couldn' t cough effectively to exclude the sputum,were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in each group were given compressed, ultrasonic and simplified nebulization respectively besides the routine therapy with antibiotics. Result There was significant difference among the three types of nebulizations in the effect of sputum excretion ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions Compressed nebulization has a higher compliance, lower frequency of side effect and more effectiveness than simplified nebulization. Meanwhile, it is more simple, suitable and has less drop loss than ultrasonic nebulization. So compressed nebulization is the preferred method in clinical practice,
出处
《护理管理杂志》
2006年第1期34-35,共2页
Journal of Nursing Administration
关键词
雾化吸入
呼吸道
排痰
nebulization inhalation
respiratory tract
sputum excretion