我国住宅权行政法保护缺失分析被引量：15

Analysis on Deficiency of Administrative Law Protection of Dwelling Right in China

导出

摘要住宅权作为宪法规定的一项自由权,尚未扩张到生存权意义上的公民“对住宅”的权利,对该权利的保护,目前还是行政法的盲区。即使是对自由权意义上的住宅权的保护,我国的行政法也存在很多缺陷:一是《治安管理处罚法》等法律在保护公民的住宅免受他人非法侵入上还存在住宅范围不清、“非法侵入”的标准不明等缺陷;二是《城市房屋拆迁管理条例》和《土地管理法》在尊重公民住宅权上也存在不少疏忽;三是住宅权事实上是一种没有救济的权利,目前只能将住宅权降格为财产权并依据《行政诉讼法》和《国家赔偿法》的规定获得很少的救济。 The dweUing right is a right to freedom prescribed in the constitution, but its protection is still blind in the administrative law. Even if we just concern the protection of dwelling right in the sense of right to freedom, there are still many deficiencies in administrative law. First, the scope of residency and the standard of unlawful intrusion are not clear in the Regulations of PRC on Punishments in Public Order and Security Administration; Second, there exist many negligence in Regulations Governing Urban House Demolition and Relocation and Law of PRC on Land Administration in the protection of citizen＇ s dwelling right. Third, the dwelling right has no remedy actually, and it is regarded as property right in the present, and get few remedy according to administrative litigation law and state compensation law.

作者肖泽晟

机构地区南京大学法学院

出处《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 2006年第1期43-50,共8页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基金 2003年度川良一基金项目(0105H018)。

关键词住宅权行政法非法侵入 Dwelling Right Administrative Law Unlawful Intrusion

分类号 D922.1 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] TU241 [建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1David J.Bodenhamer and James W.Ely, Jr. The Bill of Rights in Modem America after 200 Years,Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993, P. 122.
2尹中立.《房价涨跌本由市场调节总理为什么要关心房价》[N].《南方周末》,2005年3月20日.
3F. Stevens Redbum and Terry F. Buss, Responding to America' s Homeless, New York : Praeger Publishers,1986, P. 14 - 15.
4林来梵.卧室里的宪法权利[J].法学家,2003(3):15-19. 被引量：32
5张弈姿.《“看黄碟”风波全记录》[N].《北京青年报》,2003年1月3日.
6[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克夏勇泽.《民权公约评注》(上)[M].生活、读书、新知三联书店,2003年版.第301页.
7Tony Mauro, Illustrated Great Decisions of The Supreme Court, A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc,2000, P. 85.
8David J. Bodenhamer and James W. Ely, Jr., The Bill of Rights in Modern America after 200 Years, P.127- 128.
9David J, Bodenhamer and James W. Ely, Jr., The Bill of Rights in Modem America after 200 Years,P. 122.
10Kyllo v. United States, Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the United Circuit, No.99 - 8508.

二级参考文献2

1Miller v.California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973).
2Cf. Ole Hansen,"A balanced approach?",collected in John Benyon & Colin Bourn,The Police:Powers,Procedures and Proprieties,Pergamon Press,p.104.