金圣叹、李渔文论之不同特点新探

New Exploration of Literary Comment Difference between JIN Shengtan and LI Yu

金圣叹和李渔虽同属明末清初的文学家,且都精于小说戏曲理论批评,但两人的性格为人、生活态度、人生道路等许多方面也存在不同之处。因此,金圣叹与李渔的文学思想也有明显的不同,呈现各自独有的特点。金圣叹服膺司马迁“发愤著书”的创作理念,推崇悲剧,肯定《水浒传》与《西厢记》都是以悲剧结尾的杰作。李渔则表明并不认同“发愤著书”,宣扬“唯我填词不卖愁”,极力肯定喜剧创作,甚至认为自己的诗文“皆属笑资”。

Both as literateurs during the transitional period of Ming-Qing, JIN Sheng tan and LI Yu were proficient in opera and novel theory criticisms . But there were many differences between them ： personality and behaviour, life style,road in human life and so on . Therefore, their literary thought distinguished evidently, presenting each unique characteristics . Convinced ＂writing for indignation ＂ of SIMA Qian,JIN Shengtan prasied tragedy highly,confirmed ＂ All Men Are Brothers ＂ and ＂ Romance of West Chamber ＂ were both masterpieces with tragic en-ding. Stated clearly writing not on account of discontent, LI Yu affirmed comedy creation vigoro-usly, made his standpoint of ＂composing without selling worrying ＂ known, even thought his po-ems and proses all belonging to jape.