比较靶身高评估四川大学生终身高方法

A COMPARISON OF TARGET HEIGHT AND FINAL HEIGHT OF UNDERGRADUATES OF SICHUAN PROVINCE.

目的:用两种靶身高评估方法(CMH、FPH)试评估一组已达终身高的四川的大学生,拟了解何种方法更适合本地区儿童,为临床应用提供参考。方法:对已达终身高的川籍大学生525例(男277例,女248例)准确测定其身高,调查父母身高,用CMH、FPH方法计算各组的靶身高,再与终身高比较。结果:城乡父母身高SDS有差异(男:父母P=0.000;女:父P=0.000,母P=0.022)。经济收入不同身高有差异(男P=0.001,女P=0.048),瑞士、香港(中国)四川身高有差异(P=0.000)。不同性别FH与CMH相关性P=0.000(男、女(r)0.403,0.618);与FPH相关性P=0.000(男、女(r)0.372,0.615);男女两种方法所得剩余身高与终身高的相关性都较好。四川男生CMH剩余身高与FH接近(0.53)、四川女生FPH剩余身高与FH接近(-0.79)。结论:种族与经济状况对终身高有较大影响。四川男女各自对靶身高适应性不同,CMH适用前者,FMH适用后者。

Objective： To confirm which method （CMH, FPH） is useful for the children of Sichuan.Methods： 525 Sichuan undergraduates （male： 277; female. 248） were chosen to compare their FAH achieving final height with target height. Their FAH were measured and their target height were evaluated by using CMH and FPH methods on the basis of their parental helghts.Result： Hieights were significant different among parents with different incomes, （male, female： P=0. 001; 0.048） .Height of Swedish, Hong Kong （Chinese） and Sichuan of China were significant different （P = 0.000） .FAH was correlated with CMH, FPH and midparental height （male, female： P = 0.000）. Significant correlations can be seen in the CMH residual final height of Sichuan boy students was close to FAH （0.53） ; and the FPH residual final height of Sichuan girl students, was close to FAH （ - 0.79）. Conclusion： It shows that different adaptability to their respective FAH between male and female of Sichuan province. The model CMH is suitable for the former while FMH is suitable for the latter.