期刊文献+

逻辑、心理与认知——论后弗雷格时代逻辑学的发展 被引量:21

Logic, Mind and Cognition——On the Development of Logic in the post-Frege Time
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪初产生的弗雷格逻辑拒斥人和心理因素,但即使在弗雷格时代,它也仅仅是逻辑学的一种流派,同时还有重视心理因素的直觉主义逻辑和其他逻辑理论的存在。在后弗雷格时代,逻辑学实现了对自然语言和人的回归,如乔姆斯基的唯理主义和心理主义语言学在语言分析中强调先天语言能力,重视心理因素。此时,心理逻辑将逻辑分析与心理分析结合在一起,重新考虑人的因素和心理因素对人类思维的影响。在认知科学的背景下,逻辑学只有重新回归于人,才能在探索人类心智奥秘的过程中发挥应有的作用。 Frege's logic, which denies the factors of mankind and his mind, is just suitable in some fields, e.g. in deduction, but not in induction, of mathematics. We would be wrong if we extended his truth to other fields, for example, daily life or philosophy. Something like the factors of mankind and mental elements that Frege gave up is just the starting point of new revolution in logic and philosophy. After Frege, logicians and philosophers returned to the natural language in the middle of the 20^th century. J. L. Austin (1955) found some kinds of utterances, performatives that are of doing something in saying something, which are meaningful but not true or false. Then, he created his famous theory of speech acts, which is the foundational theory of pragmatics that gives consideration to man, the user of language. N. Chomsky (1957) developed his syntactic theory in rationalism and psychologism, which takes Language Faculty (LF) as innate, viewing language as the mirror of mind. After these developments, a new inter-discipline, cognitive science, was set up in the mid 1970s. Therefore, this author thinks that it would be necessary to institute a new frame of logic in the background of cognitive science, say, cognitive logic. The author got the cognitive logic system made up of six disciplines-philosophlcal logic, mental logic, logic of language, logics in culture and evolution, logics in AI, and logic of neuro-web-by mapping six branches of cognitive science into the fields of modern logic. The author points out that some new fields of cognitive logic, such as mental logic and logic in culture and evolution should be paid more attention to. In this paper, the different characteristics of mental logic and Frege's logic are analyzed in detail. Mental logic is a new discipline integrating logic with psychology, in which the mentation that Frege had forsaken came back again into logic. The author points out that logic faculty, like language faculty, is also innate. Therefore, logic must have some certain structures and modalities that are genetic, innate and mental. Finally, the author concludes that logic cannot function in exploring man's mind in cognitive science until it has returned to mankind himself.
作者 蔡曙山
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2006年第3期5-12,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 心理 认知 心理逻辑 后弗雷格时代 逻辑学 logic mind cognition logic of mind Frege
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1G.弗雷格:数的概念[A].保罗·贝纳塞拉夫,希拉里·普特南.数学哲学[C].朱水林,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.149—183.
  • 2G弗雷格.算术基础[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.8-9.
  • 3R.卡尔纳普.数学的逻辑主义基础[A].保罗·贝纳塞拉夫,希拉里·普特南.数学哲学[C].朱水林,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.47—60.
  • 4A.海廷.数学的直觉主义基础[A].保罗·贝纳塞拉夫,希拉里·普特南.数学哲学[C].朱水林,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.60—70.
  • 5冯·诺伊曼.数学的形式主义基础[A].保罗·贝纳塞拉夫,希拉里·普特南.数学哲学[C].朱水林,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.70—76.
  • 6维特根斯坦.哲学研究·前言[M].李步楼,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 7冼景炬.维特根斯坦与西方哲学的终结[A].陈波.分析哲学[C].成都:四川教育出版社,2001.430-441.
  • 8J.亨迪卡.谁将扼杀分析哲学[A].张力峰,译.陈波.分析哲学[C].成都:四川教育出版社,2001.
  • 9CHOMSKY N. Rules and Representations[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
  • 10PAIS A. Subtle is the Lord...The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1982.

二级参考文献16

  • 1F Ungerer and H J Schmid,A Introduetion to Cognitive Linguistics,Preface by Chomsky,外语教学与研究出版社,2001:F13,F16,F15.
  • 2George Lakoff and Mark Johnson,Philosophy in the Flesh:The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought,Basie Books,A Membes of the Perseus Books Group,1999,pp.5—7,P.78,P.76.
  • 3Jamal Otthalla, Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Principles and Parametres to Minimalism (Second edition), Edward Anold (Publishers) Limited, 1999, pp.43- 60.
  • 4R Montague, The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. Reprinted in Montague, Formal Philosophy: Selected Paper of Richard Montague. Edited by Richmond H Thomason. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974, pp.247 - 270.
  • 5Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell guide to Philosophical Logic,Blachwell Publishers, 2001. p. 1.
  • 6Rips, L J Mental muddles, In Brand M and Harnish R M (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, Tucson,Ariz. : University of Arizona Press, 1986, p.279.
  • 7Wason, P C Reasoning. In Foss B (ed. ) New Horizons in Psychology, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966.
  • 8Paul Thagard, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1996, p. 17.
  • 9Paul Thagerd, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1996, pp. 19 - 39.
  • 10Paul Thagard, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, 1996, pp.36- 37.

共引文献20

同被引文献151

引证文献21

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部