学科政策与科学政策——基于科学基金的思考被引量：7

POLICY FOR DISCIPLINES AND POLICY FOR SCIENCE

导出

摘要学科政策是科学政策的重要组成部分,对国家科学的发展影响深远。本文从学科的功能和学科政策的基本内涵出发,考察学科政策的社会经济因素及其影响,比较分析发达国家学科政策的主要类型和特点,指出国家科学资助机构在促进学科发展中的独特优势,进而提示对我国学科建设和学科发展的启示意义。 Policy for disciplines is an important part of science policy. It also plays an important role in the development of science for many countries. The paper starts with an analysis at the basic functions of scientific disciplines and the relationship between the policy for disciplines and for science. It examines how the socio-economic elements influence national policy for disciplines, followed by a comparative study on different types of the policy for disciplines in developed countries. It especially points out the unique advantage of national research funding agencies in the implementation of policy for disciplines, which reveals lessons for our country to science development.

作者龚旭

机构地区国家自然科学基金委员会政策局

出处《中国科学基金》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期164-169,共6页 Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China

关键词科学政策学科战略科学基金 science policy, disciplinary development, research funding agency

分类号 G322 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1托马斯·库恩著，李宝恒，纪树立译．科学革命的结构．上海：上海科学技术出版社，1980年．
2本·戴维著，赵佳苓译．科学家在社会中的角色．成都：四川人民出版社，1988年．
3Etel Solingen. Between Markets and the State: Scientists in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 26 ( 1 ) : 31-51.
4日本科学技术政策史研究会编著，邱华盛等译．日本科学技术政策史．北京：中国科学技术出版社，1997年．
5威廉·J．克林顿曾国屏（译）.科学与国家利益[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.26-27.
6Richard Whitley. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford University Press, 2000 (Second Edition).
7National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering 2006,Arlington, VA (NSB 06-01), February2006, http://www.nsf. gov/statistics/seind06/, 2006年2月23日 .
8D．E．司托克斯著，周春彦，谷春立译．基础科学与技术创新．北京：科学出版社，1999年．
9V．布什等著，范岱年，解道华等译．科学—没有止境的前沿．北京：商务印书馆，2004年．
10苏珊·科岑斯,郝刘祥,袁江洋.二十一世纪科学:自主与责任[J].科学文化评论,2005,2(5):50-64. 被引量：24

二级参考文献23

1[1]Barber, B. J. 1962. Science and the Social Order. New York: Collier.
2[2]Bortnick, J. and Miller, N. R. 1986. Scientific and technical information. In Albert H. Teich and Jill H. Pace (eds.), Science and Technology in the USA. London: Longman.
3[3]Brown, J. S. 1995. Contribution in report on: Workshop to Assess Corporate Research Restructuring. National Academy of Sciences.
4[4]Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington DC: Public Affairs Press.
5[5]Cozzens, S. E. 1990. Autonomy and power in science. In S. E. Cozzens and T. F. Gieryn (eds.),Theories of Science in Society. Bloomington: Indian University Press.
6[6]Cozzens, S. E. and Melkers, J. 1998. Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs. Policy Studies Journal.
7[7]England, J. M. 1983. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation's Formative Years, 1945-57. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
8[8]Gore, A. 1997. The metaphor of distributed intelligence. Science, 272: 177.
9[9]Greenwood, M. R. C. 1996. Desperately seeking friends. Science, 272: 933.
10[10]Hillman, D. J. 1982. Decision making with modern information and communications technology:opportunities and constraints. In Albert H. Teich and Ray Thomto (eds.), Science, Technology,and the Issues of the Eighties: Policy Outlook. Boulder, CO: Westview.