期刊文献+

皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价 被引量:125

Land Use Change and Eco-security Assessment of Huangfuchuan Watershed
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于"3S"技术揭示了皇甫川流域近十多年来的土地利用变化状况,并进一步在像元水平上对流域生态安全进行了综合评价,最后重点分析了流域土地利用变化与生态安全的关系。结果表明:①近十几年来,皇甫川流域土地利用变化剧烈,土地利用格局持续承受着来自当地快速城市化进程及社会经济发展和生态环境保护及建设两方面相互矛盾的巨大压力;②1987年到2000年,流域生态安全状况有所好转,但整体好转的状况难掩局部地区生态环境在大规模治理和恢复的背景下发生的恶化;③流域内林地、耕地、灌丛、水体、城镇用地和草地从面积上看,基本上均处于生态安全的预警状态,而裸砒砂岩和沙地的绝对大部分属于中警状态或重警(巨警)状态;④6种不同土地利用类型的安全指数大小顺序基本保持为灌丛>林地>草地>耕地>沙地>裸砒砂岩,表明林、灌措施是流域生态恢复和重建的首选和重要组成部分,而沙地尤其是分布面积较广的裸砒砂岩则是流域生态环境综合治理的难题和关键。最后,提出了通过优化流域土地利用格局来确保生态安全的初步设想。 Supported by "3S" technology, this paper analyses land use change in Huangfuchuan Watershed from 1987 to 2000, conducts a synthetic eco-security assessment on the watershed by multiplication algorithm model on the pixel scale, and discusses the relationship between different land use patterns and eco-security of watershed. The results showed: (1) In recent 10 years, the general tendency of land use change in the study area was that the proportion of urban land, woodland, cropland and shrub increased constantly and that of water area, grassland, sandy land and bare rock decreased gradually. During this period, the watershed land use pattern was under the tremendous pressure from the conflict between the rapid urbanization, economic development and the Conservation and rehabilitation of eco-environment. The distinct decline of water area is the bottleneck of this contradiction. (2) From 1987 to 2000, the average synthetical eco-security index rose from 6.033 to 6.506. It is sure that the eco-environment of the whole watershed has been improved. However, eco-environment in some areas even went worse despite of large-scale comprehensive harnessment. (3) In Huangfuchuan Watershed, most of the sandy and soft rocky lands are in a moderate-warning or serious-warning state of eco-security, and the rest of the land use types basically in a light-warning state of eco-security. (4) Land use types are closely correlated with eco-security. The order of eco-security index is: shrub 〉 woodland 〉 grassland 〉 cropland 〉 sand 〉 soft rock, which indicates that measures taken based on woodland and shrub are the priority and important means for ecological restoration of the watershed. Furthermore, the sandy land and bare rocky land are the key problems of comprehensive harnessment of the watershed, which could not be overlooked. Generally, this paper emphasized the impacts of different land use types and patterns on eco-security of watershed and put forward suggestions concerning the adjustment or optimization of land use pattern and improvement of the technical system for eco-security assessment based on simulation and prediction of land use change, which would have wide application prospectives in the future.
出处 《地理学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期645-653,共9页 Acta Geographica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30370625) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目(NCET-04-0149)~~
关键词 皇甫川流域 土地利用变化 生态安全评价 Huangfuchuan Watershed land use change eco-security assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Pascher K,Gollmann G.Ecological risk assessment of transgenic plant releases:an Austrian perspective.Biodiversity and Conservation,1999,8:1139-1158.
  • 2Vlyssides A G.Electrochemical treatment of vinasse from beet molasses.Water Science and Technology Proceedings of the 1996 and IAWQ International Conference on Pretreatment of Industrial Wastewaters,1996.
  • 3Folmer E C R,Geurts P M H,Francisco J R.Assessment of soil fertility depletion in Mozambique.Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,1998,71:159-167.
  • 4Ciro Gardi,Marcello Tomaselli,Vittorio Parisi et al.Soil quality indicators and biodiversity in northern Italian permanent grasslands.European Journal of Soil Biology,2002,38:103-110.
  • 5曾德慧,姜凤岐,范志平,杜晓军.生态系统健康与人类可持续发展[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(6):751-756. 被引量:166
  • 6罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,邓红兵,张萍,吴钢.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614. 被引量:158
  • 7孔红梅,赵景柱,马克明,张 萍,姬兰柱,邓红兵,陆兆华.生态系统健康评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4):486-490. 被引量:255
  • 8黄和平,杨劼,宋炳煜,包铁军.内蒙古黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1048-1056. 被引量:23
  • 9Rapport D J.Ecosystem services and management options as blanket indicators of ecosystem health.Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health,1995,4(2):97-105.
  • 10左伟,王桥,王文杰,刘建军,杨一鹏.区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):67-71. 被引量:423

二级参考文献88

共引文献1556

同被引文献1734

引证文献125

二级引证文献2224

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部