期刊文献+

论朱希祖的《臣瓒姓氏考》 被引量:3

On the Paper of ZHU Xi-zu: The Examination of the CHEN Zan's Surname
原文传递
导出
摘要 臣瓒《汉书音义》研究是《汉书》旧注研究中的重要课题,向为古今学者所重视。臣瓒姓名存在六种不同说法,迄今尚无定论。朱希祖曾提出臣瓒为“裴瓒”说,而其文在海外已难寻觅,这自然在一定程度上影响了此项研究在海外的顺利进展。朱希祖认为,裴氏为河东名门望族;裴瓒之官职“秘书郎”与“中书郎”职可互通;《晋书·裴瓒传》不载其集解《汉书音义》乃因史笔所讳。 CHEN Zan's the Pronunciation and Meaning of Han Shu is very important among the Han Shu Commentaries. And it has always been attached much weight to by scholars. There are six views about the Name of Chen Zan and up to now there is not any conclusion. Around 1940's, ZHU Xizu proposed that CHEN Zan is PEI Zan. But his article on“CHEN Zan's name”had long been difficult to search. This nature has affected this research in the certain degree in the overseas. Recent years, I discovered this article, therefore I unified the related research and the historical data, carried on to this article has discussed and introduced.
作者 李步嘉
出处 《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期70-74,共5页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 朱希祖 洪业 臣瓒 姓氏考 CHEN Zan; Willian Hung ZHU Xi-zu;the examination of the surname
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 2王先谦.汉书补注[M].北京:书目文献出版社,1995.
  • 3杨守敬.水经注疏[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,湖北教育出版社,1997.
  • 4洪颐煊.诸史考异:续惨四库全书(第455册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
  • 5朱希祖.臣瓒姓氏考[J].中国史学,1946,(1).
  • 6杨宪益.《汉书注》“臣瓒”为杨瓒说[N].中央日报,1947—07—21.
  • 7胡适.注《汉书》的薛瓒[J].清华学报,1960,(1).
  • 8孟森.臣瓒考[J].责善半月刊,1941,(21).
  • 9赵贞信.臣瓒考跋[J].责善,1941,(21).
  • 10岑仲勉.“臣瓒”为傅瓒说仍须保留[N].中央日报,1948—02—23.

共引文献2459

同被引文献24

引证文献3

;
使用帮助 返回顶部