期刊文献+

唐氏综合征产前筛查方案选择的成本-效果分析 被引量:11

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:从经济学的角度探讨适合中国国情的唐氏综合征产前筛查方案。方法:运用成本效果分析,计算两联筛查和三联筛查不同检出率与假阳性率下每检出1例唐氏综合征的费用,并进行比较,费用最低方案为优选方案。结果:在以医院为中心筛查情况下,在37.39%的产前诊断率时,酶联免疫法两联筛查每检出1例唐氏综合征费用在336156-845274元;时间分辨法两联筛查每检出1例唐氏综合征费用在600727-1756865元;化学发光法三联筛查每检出1例唐氏综合征费用在743756元-2404572元。结论:酶联免疫法两联筛查最佳方案为方案E(检出率84.62%,假阳性率9.32%),每检出1例唐氏综合征费用最低(336156元);时间分辨法两联筛查最佳方案为方案H(检出率77.78%,假阳性率21.46%),每检出1例唐氏综合征费用最低(600727元);化学发光法三联筛查最佳方案为方案H(检出率90.91%,假阳性率6.14%),每检出1例唐氏综合征费用最低(743756元)。 Objective: To find out the most economical schemes of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Methods: Dectection rates by the methods of double and triple screening were analysed on the basis of cost - effectiveness analysis, and the cost of per Down's syndrome founded out was calculated and compared. Results: The costs per Down's syndrome detected by methods of double - test enzyme linkedimmunsorbsent assay ( ELISA), double - test time resolved fluoroisnmunoassay ( TRFIA ) and triple - test chemiluminesent immunoassay were336,156 - 845,274 RMB, 600,727 - 1,756,865 RMB and 743,756 - 2, 404,572 RMB, respectively. Conclusion: The best schemes of double- test ELISA, double- test TRFIA and triple -test Chemiluminesent Immunoassay were project E, H and H, and the lowest cost of per Down's syndrome detected was 336,156 RMB, 600,727 RMB and 743,756 RMB, respectively, with 84.62%, 77.78%, 90. 91% for detection rate and 9.32%, 21.46% and 6. 14% for false positive rate.
出处 《中国计划生育学杂志》 北大核心 2006年第7期410-412,共3页 Chinese Journal of Family Planning
基金 国家"十五"重点科技攻关资助项目(编号:2002BA709B10)
关键词 唐氏综合征 筛查 成本效果 Down's syndrome Screening Cost -effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1尹向东,陈新黔,廖琳,丁显平,魏霞,康格非.21三体综合征产前筛查新进展[J].国外医学(临床生物化学与检验学分册),2003,24(6):349-350. 被引量:22
  • 2Wald N J, Kennard A. Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Downs syndrome.J Med Screen, 1997,4: 181 - 247.
  • 3Nicholas J Wald, Anne Kennard, Allan Hackshaw, et al. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Health Technology Assessment, 1998 ,2( 1 ):77 - 84.

二级参考文献3

共引文献21

同被引文献90

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部