期刊文献+

为研发而申请专利还是为专利申请而研发 被引量:20

Patenting for R&D vs R&D for the Patent
原文传递
导出
摘要 在传统的“为研发而申请专利”的逻辑下,专利仅仅是研发活动的结果和表现,其战略重要性被明显低估。产业垂直分工和知识型企业的大量涌现表明,专利申请动机已明显地从防御性技术保护向进攻性价值创造转变;专利被视作有形化的知识商品从幕后走上前台成为企业和国家竞相争夺的焦点;对专利认识也正像市场营销理念那样从供应导向观向需求导向观转变。为此,本文提出以“为专利申请而研发”作为逻辑起点的新的专利战略概念框架。 In the context of complex product and systems, the emergence of patent tickets, patent paradox and so on shows that the companies have shifted from supply-orientation to demand-orientation. The limitation of time and space on monopoly results in the existence of complementary and blocking patents, which is the internal reason for the phenomena of patent tickets. From the perspective of strategic management, such mechanism actually set a space-time unique of every patent's the competitive advantages. According to this, the article takes "R&D for patenting" as the logic start, and sets up a new conceptual framework of patent strategy, and make patent niche as the core of it.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第7期86-93,共8页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"跨国公司制造业和服务业外包发展趋势与我国政策研究"(批准号04BJY003)
关键词 专利战略 需求导向专利战略 专利生态位 patent strategy demand-oriented patent strategy patent niche
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Breschi S., Cassi L., Malerba F. Data and Methodological Issues on Patents and Patent Citations. Report to the European Commission[R]. STI-NET Project,2004.
  • 2Hall B.H.,Ziedonis R. M. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the Semiconductor Industry,1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economics,2001, 32(1).
  • 3Jaffe B. Characterizing the 'Technological Position' of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers[J]. Research Policy, 1989, (18).
  • 4Langinier C., Moschini, G. The Economics of Patents: An Overview[R]. Iowa State University, 2002.
  • 5Levin R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987,(3).
  • 6Kortum S., J. Lerner. Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting[J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998, (48).
  • 7Reitzig, M. Strategic Management of Intellectual Property[J]. MIT S MReview 2004, 45(3).
  • 8Shapiro C. Navigating the Patent Thicket. Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting [A]. In Adam Jaffee, J. L., and Scott Stem, Ed. Innovation Policy and the Economy[M]. MIT Press,2001.
  • 9Somaya D. Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Strategy [R]. Working Paper, RH Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, 2002.
  • 10迈克尔·波特.竞争论[M].北京:中信出版社,2003..

二级参考文献55

  • 1刘林青,谭力文.国外“专利悖论”研究综述——从专利竞赛到专利组合竞赛[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(4):10-14. 被引量:37
  • 2Levin, R C, A K Klevoriek, R R Nelson, and S G Winter. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development[R]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987, (3):783-820.
  • 3Kortum, S and J Lemer. Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting?[R]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998,48: 247-304.
  • 4Long C. Patent signals[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2002,69:625-679.
  • 5Cohen Met al. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U S manufacturing firms patent (or not) [DB]. NBER Working Papers, http://www, nber. org/papers/w7552, 2004/12/12.
  • 6Griliehes Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature , 1990,28:1661-1662.
  • 7Alchian A A and H Demsetz. Production, information costs, and economic organization[J]. American Economic Review,1972,62:777-780.
  • 8F M Scherer. The innovation lottery[A]. Rochelle Dreyfuss et al. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge soeiety[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001:3-11.
  • 9Wagner P R and G Parehomovsky. Patent portfoliosl[DB]. SSRN Working Papers, http://ssrn, com/abstraet=582201,2004/12/12.
  • 10IBronwyn H H and R H Ziedonis. The patent paradox revisited:an empirical study of patenting in the U S semiconductor industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economies, 2001,32 : 101- 125.

共引文献469

同被引文献441

引证文献20

二级引证文献420

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部