技术、空间和权力——米歇尔·福柯的技术政治哲学被引量：14

Technology,Space and Power:Michel Foucault's Thoughts on Political Philosophy of Technology

下载PDF

导出

摘要福柯作为20世纪最有影响的政治哲学家之一,在其权力-知识概念内自然不会放过对技术这一重要的现代性现象进行哲学的思考,并从微观政治学视角把技术看作是人操控自身的“自我技术”。在此基础上,他进一步从全景敞视主义出发就工厂、医院、学校等空间单元讨论了技术与权力的特定关系,其政治批判直接指向的是任何情景化的技术都是对人体的权力控制并由此造就了作为技术权力效应的“肉体-机器”这一“敌托邦”。沿此政治批判线索,其追随者和其他学者更是把全景敞视主义方法拓展到了对实验室、工业区域、互联网络和基因技术等的政治哲学分析,从“生物-权力”视角提出诸如“半机械人”、“半生物人”等概念,由此显现新兴技术对人体产生的权力控制效应。为了激发对这种技术控制的有效对抗,福柯试图复兴一种具有“生存美学”特征的地方性知识或技术,以摆脱占据统治地位的技术权力控制。 Michel Foucault,one of the most influential philosophers of politics in the 20th century,gave the concept of power-knowledge,spontaneously provided a philosophical thinking about technology as the significant phenomenon of modernity,and treated technology as the micro-political 'self-technology' of man's controlling himself.From the political view of panopticism,he advanced an exploration into the special relations between technology and power in spatial units such as factory,hospital and school,and pointed at the political critique of human bodies dominated by localized technique or technology through which the dystopia of 'body-machine' is made.Along with this clue,his followers and other scholars extended the method of panopticism into political philosophical analysis on laboratory,industrial region,internet or gene engineering,and revealed the powerful effects on human bodies of new technologies by suggesting the 'bio-power' concepts such as 'cyborgs' and 'bioborgs'.To inspire the effective resistance to power as technology,Foucault himself tried to rebound local knowledge or technology with 'aesthetics of existence' so as to escape from the powerful domination of mainstream technology.

作者李三虎

机构地区广州行政学院马克思主义研究室

出处《公共管理学报》 2006年第3期34-43,共10页 Journal of Public Management

关键词全景敞视主义权力-知识生物-权力生存美学 Panopticism Power/knowledge Bio-power Aesthetics of existence

分类号 N02 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1[1]GERRIE J.Was Foucault a Philosopher of Technology?[J].Techné:Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2003,2(7):14-26.
2杨大春.反思的现代性与技术理性的解构——海德格尔和福柯论现代技术问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,19(2):48-53. 被引量：23
3薛勇民,李侠.论福柯权力视野下的技术[J].自然辩证法研究,2002,18(1):6-9. 被引量：8
4[9][法]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].北京:三联书店,1999.131.
5[5]FEENBERG A.Critical Theory of Technology[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1991:71.
6[6]FOUCAULT M,GORDON C.Power Knowledge:Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977[M].New York:Pantheon Pantheon,1980.
7[7]FOUCAULT M.The Subject and Power[C]//DREYFUS,RABINOW.FOUCAULT M.Beyound Structuralism and Hermeneutics.Chicago:Chicago University Press,1982.
8[9]DURBIN P T.Philosophy of Technology[M].New York:Norwell Kluwer,1989.
9[10]FERRE F.Philosophy of Technology[M].Georgia:The University of Georgia Press,1995.
10[11]IHDE D.Philosophy of Technology:An Introduction[M].New York:Paragon Press,1993.

二级参考文献16

1冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术[M].北京:中国社会学科学出版社,1998.5-10.
2马丁·海德格尔孙周兴等译.海德格尔选集[C].上海:上海三联书店,1996.925.
3马克斯·韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].北京:三联书店,1987.51.
4安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].南京：译林出版社,2000..
5汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔.哲学解释学[C].夏镇平等译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994.9.
6安东尼·吉登斯,克里斯多弗·皮尔森.现代性:吉登斯访谈录[N].尹宏毅译.北京:新华出版社,2001.69,17,17,93.
7Michel Foucault. Politics, Philosophy, Culture[C]. London: Routledge Press, 1990.34.
8马丁·海德格尔.面向思的事情[C].孙周兴等译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.60-61,61.
9冈特·绍伊博尔.海德格尔分析新时代的技术[M].宋祖良译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.184,182.
10Michel Foucault. Dits et Eerits (IV) [C]. Paris: editions Gallimard, 1994. 170 - 171,804 - 813,223.