摘要
无论在理论界还是实践中无不将职务犯罪主体界定为代表国家管理公共事务、行使公共权力的人员,但“职务”的本源意义并无此限定。这种不统一的情况与我国的干部人事制度的变革有关。解决这一问题的最佳途径是用“国职犯罪”概念代替原有的“职务犯罪”概念。
The subject of duty crime has been defined as someone who represents our country to manage public affairs and exercise public power whether in theory or practice. But the etymon of"duty" has not the limitation. The difference has something to do with the change of the personal system of cadres in our country. Thus, the best way to resolve the problem is to replace the concept of" duty crime" with "national duty crime".
出处
《天中学刊》
2006年第4期47-49,共3页
Journal of Tianzhong