期刊文献+

联合霉酚酸酯、环孢素A和泼尼松应用于肾移植患者免疫抑制治疗 被引量:7

Immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients with Cellcept, Cyclosporine A and Prednison
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究不同剂量霉酚酸酯(MMF)与环孢素A(CsA)和泼尼松(Pred)联用对肾移植患者免疫抑制作用的疗效与安全性。方法随机将120例肾移植受者分为3组,分别给予MMF2.0g/d(A组)、1.5g/d(B组)及硫唑嘌呤(Aza)100mg/d(C组)。3组患者均同时接受相似剂量的CsA和Pred。观察肾移植术后6个月内急性排斥反应的发生率、移植肾功能和药物的副作用。结果A,B,C组急性排斥反应的发生率分别为8.7%,5.6%和36.8%;A,B组消化道的副作用多见,C组的白细胞减少现象多见,其他副作用3个组的差异无显著性。术后6个月A,B组患者的血清肌酐值明显低于C组。结论不同剂量的MMF与CsA和Pred联合应用,可有效预防术后早期急性排斥反应的发生。MMF除胃肠道的副作用较多外,其他副作用未见增多。 [Objective] To investigate the immunosuppresslve effect and safety of with different doses of Cellcept (MMF), Cyclosporine A (CsA) and Prednison (Pred) for renal transplant recipients. [Methods] 120 cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly divided into 3 groups, receiving MMF 2.0 g/d , CsA and Pred (group A),. MMF 1.5 g/d, CsA and Pred (group B) and Azathioprine (Aza) 100 mg/d, CsA and Pred(greup C)respectively. The incidence of the acute renal allograft rejection, the function of the renal graft and the adverse effects were observed at the first 6 months after renal transplantation. [Results] The incidence of the acute rejection was 8.7%,5.6%, 36.8% in the groups A, B and C respectively. The frequency of diarrhea was the highest in the group A and the leukocyte decrease was the highest in the group C, and other side events were similar among the three groups. Six months after transplantation, serum creatinine level in group A and B was obviously lower than that of the group C. [Conclusions] Combined use of different dose of MMF with CsA and Pred can effectively prevent the occurrence of acute rejection after transplantation. Except for the side events of diarrhea, other MMF-induced side effects are not increased.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第17期2640-2642,共3页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 肾移植 免疫抑制剂 kidney transplantation immunosuppressive agents
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1武国军,王禾,张波,王鹏飞,潘光辉,张峻,汤群辉,李欣,郭炜.HLA氨基酸残基配型标准在肾移植中的应用[J].第四军医大学学报,2002,23(24):2286-2288. 被引量:4
  • 2BULLINGHAM RE,MONROS S,NICHOLLS A,et al.Pharmacokinetics and bionvailability of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy subjects after single-dose oral and intervenous administration[J].J Clin Pharmacol,1996,36(4):315-324.
  • 3ALLISON AC,EUGUI EM.Immunosuppressive and other effects of mycophenolic acid and other prodrug,mycophenolate mofetil[J].Immunol Rev,1993,136(12):5-28.
  • 4SATOH S,TADA H,TACHIKI Y,et al.Chrono and clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in continuous intravenous administration[J].Int J Urol,2001,8(7):353-358.
  • 5BEHREND M.Mycophenolate mofetil:suggested guidelines for use in kidney transplantation[J].BioDrugs,2001,15(1):37-53.
  • 6VANRENTERGHEM YF.Tailoring immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients[J].Pediatr Transplan,2001,5 (6):467-472.
  • 7MEIER-KRIESCHE HU,KAPLAN B.Immunosuppression in elderly eenal transplant recipients:are current regimens too aggressive[J]? Drugs Aging,2001,18(10):751-759.
  • 8ALLISON AC,EUGUI EM.The design and development of an immunosuppressive drug,mycophenolate mofetil[J].Springer Semin Immunopathol,1993,14(4):353-380.
  • 9AZUMA H,BINDER J,HEEMANN U,et al.Effect of RS61443on chronic rejection of rat kidney allografts[J].Transplant Proc,1995,27(1):436-437.
  • 10刘思平,黄健,杜秀华,林双容,杨健英,蔡爱莲,李春花,魏雪梅,曾安祥,张华,罗伟雄,丘媚妮,郭丽堃.同种异体肾移植的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2004,14(18):116-117. 被引量:2

二级参考文献12

  • 1Terasaki PI, Cho Y, Takemoto S, Cecka M, Gjertson D. Twenty-year follow-up on the effect of HLA matching on kidney transplant survival and prediction of future twenty-year survival [J]. Transplant Proc, 1996;28(3):1144-1145.
  • 2Mason PM, Parham P. HLA class I region sequences,1998 [J]. Tissue Antigens, 1998;51(5):417-466.
  • 3Mason SGE. HLA class Ⅱ region sequences, 1998 [J]. Tissue Antigens, 1998;51(5):467-507.
  • 4Gjertson DW, Terasaki PI, Takemoto S, Mickey MR. National allocation of cadaveric kidneys by HLA matching. Projected effect on outcome and costs [J]. N Engl J Med, 1991;324(15):1032-1036.
  • 5Takemoto S, Terasaki PI. HLA compatibility can be predicted by matching only three residues with outward oriented sidechains [J]. Transplant Proc, 1996;28(3):1264-1266.
  • 6Takemoto SK. HLA amino acid residue matching [J]. Clin Transpl, 1996;28(2):397-425.
  • 7Takemoto SK, Terasaki PI, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM. Twelve years' experience with national sharing of HLA-matched cadaveric kidneys for transplantation [J]. N Engl J Med, 2000;343(15):1078-1084.
  • 8Hata Y, Cecka JM, Takemoto S, Ozawa M, Cho YW, Terasaki PI. Effects of changes in the criteria for nationally shared kidney transplants for HLA-matched patients [J]. Transplantation, 1998;65(2):208-212.
  • 9Takemoto S, Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. Benefits of HLA-CREG matching for sensitized recipients as illustrated in kidney regraftes [J]. Transplant Proc, 1997;29(4):1417-1418.
  • 10Duquesnoy RJ, Marrari M. Determination of HLA-A/B residue mismatch acceptability for kidneys transplanted into highly sensitized patients [J]. Transplantation, 1997;63(12):1743-1751.

共引文献4

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部