期刊文献+

筛检项目总效果评价的新指标——需筛检人数 被引量:2

Number needed to be screened in a study: a novel measure for disease screening effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的介绍需筛检人数(NNBS)的基本概念、计算方法及用途。方法利用需治疗人数(NNT)的基本思想引入评价筛检项目总效果的新指标,以大便隐血试验(FOBT)筛检结直肠癌的随机对照试验和X线检查筛检乳腺癌的随机对照试验的两项研究为实例,计算需邀请参加筛检人数(NNI)和NNBS。结果通过计算得到欲通过实施FOBT筛检方案,要在14年内使当地45-74岁人群预防1例因结直肠癌所致的死亡,NNI为1220人,NNBS为665人;此外,欲通过实施乳腺X线检查筛检方案,要在8年内使当地40-74岁妇女预防1例因乳腺癌所致的死亡,NNI为1961人,NNBS为1494人。结论NNBS能以较直观的方式来评价筛检项目的总效果,便于研究人员、卫生决策者和社会公众进行更好的沟通和交流。 Objective To introduce the concept, methods for calculation and application of "number needed to be screened" (NNBS) in epidemiologic studies. Methods The concept of "number needed to treat" (NNT) was extended for disease screening strategies. For the purpose of illustration, the values of number needed to invite for screening (NNI) and number needed to be screened (NNBS) were calculated on the basis of the results from two randomized controlled screening trials -- Nottingham randomized controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer and Swedish mammographic screening trial for breast cancer in two counties. Results In order to prevent one death from the colorectal cancer among local people aged from 45 to 74 during the 14 years of follow-up, the NNI and NNBS for faecal- occult-blood screening program were 1220 and 665, respectively. In addition, in order to prevent one death from breast cancer among local women aged 40-74 during 8 years of follow-up, the NNI and NNBS for mammographic screening program were 1961 and 1494, respectively. Conclusion Compared with the traditional indices, NNBS can evaluate the overall effectiveness of a screening program in an intuitively understandable manner so as to facilitate the communication among medical researchers, health workers, health policy makers and the public.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第8期725-727,共3页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
关键词 需筛检人数 随机对照试验 筛检 Number needed to be screened Randomized controlled trial Screening
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1陈维清.筛检.见:李立明,主编.流行病学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.283-297.
  • 2Richardson A.Screening and the number needed to treat.J Med Screen,2001,8:125-127.
  • 3Richardson A,Wells JE.Breast cancer screening:the effect of self selection for screening on comparisons of randomised controlled trials.J Med Screen,1997,4:16-18.
  • 4Smith RA,Duffy SW,Gabe R,et al.The randomized trials of breast cancer screening:what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am,2004,42:793-806.
  • 5Hardcastle JD,Chamberlain JO,Robinson MH,et al.Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.Lancet,1996,348:1472-1477.
  • 6Tabar L,Faberberg G,Day NE,et al.What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.Br J Cancer,1987,55:547-551.
  • 7Rembold CM.Number needed to screen:development of a statistic for disease screening.BMJ,1998,317:307-312.

共引文献1

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部